Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add consistent geometry viewer #35

Open
jdkio opened this issue Nov 22, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Add consistent geometry viewer #35

jdkio opened this issue Nov 22, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request help wanted Extra attention is needed

Comments

@jdkio
Copy link

jdkio commented Nov 22, 2024

Here's what I wrote on slack.

I'm out sick but I did create brute_force_geometry_viewer.py that lets you view geometry with consistent views. See this talk. If you're comfortable editing some python code, you can try to edit it to give you the views of what you want. You basically just need to create a 4x4 matrix that transforms xy coords from the image to the 3d location in space. The code isn't in a repo yet either, it's just here
/exp/dune/app/users/kleykamp/tms_main/geom
You'd only really need to adjust what's plotted after the if name == "main": statement at the bottom. The axis code needs a bit of work too iirc

We need to find a good location for the script, fix the axis code, and finalize what the default views are. Currently they're focused around the TMS, but there's also a wide shot

@jdkio jdkio added enhancement New feature or request help wanted Extra attention is needed labels Nov 22, 2024
@jdkio jdkio changed the title Add geometry Add consistent geometry viewer Nov 22, 2024
@ast0815
Copy link
Member

ast0815 commented Dec 4, 2024

If you want this to happen quicker, this code should get its own PR, and be decoupled from the TMS geometry update.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request help wanted Extra attention is needed
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants