Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Daemon engine does not currently support ppc64le arch #226

Open
anengineer1 opened this issue Nov 23, 2019 · 6 comments
Open

Daemon engine does not currently support ppc64le arch #226

anengineer1 opened this issue Nov 23, 2019 · 6 comments
Labels
T-Bug T-Feature-Request Proposed new feature

Comments

@anengineer1
Copy link

Greetings, the engine does not currently support ppc64le architecture and its popularity is getting increased lately.

@illwieckz
Copy link
Member

illwieckz commented Nov 23, 2019

Hi, this is known, see Unvanquished/Unvanquished#1086
In any way, we'll keep open your issue as the engine-side one.

There is two topics to explore:

  • getting rid of potential x86ism
  • porting virtual machine from nacl to wasm

Feel free to apply on anything you may think you can be helpful, at least identifying properly what would be missing or what would be broken is helpful :-)

It would be very cool to see Unvanquished and Dæmon engine running on Power

@illwieckz
Copy link
Member

I created #227 for the Wasm thing, this one will be the parent issue for tracking x86ism.

@anengineer1
Copy link
Author

Thank you a lot for your kind reply!

If I find myself in a position to help some way I certainly will.

Yes, it would be so sweet indeed to see Daemon engine under Power!

Thank you again for everything

@illwieckz
Copy link
Member

A position of tester would be helpful, do you have access to such hardware?

@anengineer1
Copy link
Author

Yes, I have a ppc64le and the fedora os installed. Just tell me, and I will do the testing!!! :-)

I'm at you service!

@ghost ghost added T-Feature-Request Proposed new feature T-Bug labels Dec 30, 2021
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Dec 30, 2021

I'm not sure if this is a bug or a feature request... lack of portability seems a bug, to me, but that's also quite close to a feature request...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
T-Bug T-Feature-Request Proposed new feature
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants