Merge pull request #933 from Jeehay28/main

[Jeehay28] WEEK 07

Author: TonyKim9401

longest-substring-without-repeating-characters/Jeehay28.js

@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
+/**
+ * @param {string} s
+ * @return {number}
+ */
+
+// 🌟 sliding window technique
+
+// Time Complexity: O(n)
+// Why it's O(n)
+// - The end pointer iterates over the string exactly once (O(n)).
+// - The start pointer also only moves forward without re-processing elements (O(n)).
+// - Therefore, the total amount of work done is proportional to the length of the string (n).
+// - So, even though there is a while loop inside the for loop, the total work done (number of operations) is still linear, O(n), because the start and end pointers together move across the string just once.
+// - This is the key reason why the time complexity is O(n), even with nested loops.
+
+// Space Complexity: O(k), where k k is the length of the longest substring without repeating characters.
+// In the worst case, k = n, so O(n)
+
+var lengthOfLongestSubstring = function (s) {
+  let start = 0;
+  let longest = 0;
+  let subString = new Set();
+
+  for (let end = 0; end < s.length; end++) {
+    while (subString.has(s[end])) {
+      // Shrink the window by moving start
+      subString.delete(s[start]);
+      start += 1;
+    }
+
+    subString.add(s[end]);
+    longest = Math.max(longest, end - start + 1);
+  }
+
+  return longest;
+};
+
+// 🛠️ Solution 1
+// Time Complexity: O(n^2), where n is the length of the string s
+// Space Complexity: O(k), where k is the length of the longest substring without repeating characters (k ≤ n)
+
+// why the space complexity is not just O(n):
+// - Saying O(n) is technically correct in the worst case,
+// - but it hides the fact that the actual space usage is proportional to the length of the longest substring without repeats,
+// - which could be much smaller than n in many practical cases (e.g., for a string like "aaabbbccc").
+
+// var lengthOfLongestSubstring = function (s) {
+//   let longest = 0;
+
+//   for (let i = 0; i < s.length; i++) {
+//     let subString = new Set();
+
+//     for (let j = i; j < s.length; j++) {
+//       if (subString.has(s[j])) {
+//         break;
+//       } else {
+//         subString.add(s[j]);
+//         longest = Math.max(longest, j - i + 1);
+//       }
+//     }
+//   }
+//   return longest;
+// };
+

number-of-islands/Jeehay28.js

@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
+/**
+ * @param {character[][]} grid
+ * @return {number}
+ */
+
+// 🌻
+// Time Complexity: O(m * n), where M is the number of rows and N is the number of columns in the grid.
+// Space Complexity: O(k), where k is the size of the largest island (k <= m * n)
+
+// The space complexity is determined by the depth of the recursive stack used by the sink function.
+// In the worst-case scenario, where the entire grid is filled with "1"s (a single large island),
+// the depth of recursion could go up to O(m * n).
+
+var numIslands = function (grid) {
+  // depth-first search (DFS) that potentially visits every connected cell in the current island
+  const sink = (row, col) => {
+    grid[row][col] = "0";
+
+    const adjacent = [
+      [row - 1, col], // up
+      [row + 1, col], // down
+      [row, col - 1], // left
+      [row, col + 1], // right
+    ];
+
+    for ([r, c] of adjacent) {
+      if (r >= 0 && r < grid.length && c >= 0 && c < grid[r].length) {
+        if (grid[r][c] === "1") {
+          sink(r, c);
+        }
+      }
+    }
+  };
+
+  let cnt = 0;
+
+  for (let i = 0; i < grid.length; i++) {
+    for (let j = 0; j < grid[0].length; j++) {
+      if (grid[i][j] === "1") {
+        cnt += 1;
+        sink(i, j);
+      }
+    }
+  }
+
+  return cnt;
+};
+
+
+

reverse-linked-list/Jeehay28.js

@@ -0,0 +1,82 @@
+/**
+ * Definition for singly-linked list.
+ * function ListNode(val, next) {
+ *     this.val = (val===undefined ? 0 : val)
+ *     this.next = (next===undefined ? null : next)
+ * }
+ */
+/**
+ * @param {ListNode} head
+ * @return {ListNode}
+ */
+
+// Time Complexity: O(n)
+// Space Complexity: O(1)
+
+// The algorithm uses a constant amount of extra space: prev, current, and nextTemp.
+// No additional data structures (like arrays or new linked lists) are created.
+// Hence, the space complexity is O(1).
+
+var reverseList = function (head) {
+  let prev = null;
+  let current = head;
+
+  while (current) {
+    let nextTemp = current.next;
+
+    current.next = prev;
+    console.log(current, prev);
+
+    prev = current;
+    console.log(current, prev);
+    current = nextTemp;
+  }
+
+  return prev; // New head of the reversed list
+};
+
+// head = [1,2,3,4,5]
+// [1] null
+// [1] [1]
+// [2,1] [1]
+// [2,1] [2,1]
+// [3,2,1] [2,1]
+// [3,2,1] [3,2,1]
+// [4,3,2,1] [3,2,1]
+// [4,3,2,1] [4,3,2,1]
+// [5,4,3,2,1] [5,4,3,2,1]
+
+// my own approach
+// Time Complexity: O(n)
+// Space Complexity: O(n)
+var reverseList = function (head) {
+  if (head === null) {
+    return null;
+  }
+
+  let current = head;
+  let arr = [];
+  // console.log(head.val)
+
+  // traverse the linked List - TC: O(n)
+  while (current) {
+    arr.push(current.val);
+    current = current.next;
+  }
+
+  // reverse the array - TC: O(n)
+  arr = arr.reverse();
+
+  let head1 = new ListNode(arr[0]);
+  let current1 = head1;
+
+  // rebuild the linked list - TC: O(n)
+  for (let i = 1; i < arr.length; i++) {
+    current1.next = new ListNode(arr[i]);
+    current1 = current1.next;
+  }
+
+  return head1;
+};
+
+

set-matrix-zeroes/Jeehay28.js

@@ -0,0 +1,106 @@
+// 🌈 In-Place Solution (Without extra space)
+// The term "in-place" refers to algorithms or solutions that modify the input data directly,
+// without needing extra space for a separate copy of the data. In an in-place solution,
+// the operations are performed using a fixed amount of extra memory, typically O(1) space, beyond the input data itself.
+
+/**
+ * @param {number[][]} matrix
+ * @return {void} Do not return anything, modify matrix in-place instead.
+ */
+
+// Time Complexity: O(m * n)
+// Space Complexity: O(1)
+var setZeroes = function (matrix) {
+  const rows = matrix.length;
+  const cols = matrix[0].length;
+
+  let firstRowHasZero = false;
+  let firstColHasZero = false;
+
+  // Check if the first row has any zero
+  for (let c = 0; c < cols; c++) {
+    if (matrix[0][c] === 0) {
+      firstRowHasZero = true;
+      break;
+    }
+  }
+
+  // Check if the first column has any zero
+  for (let r = 0; r < rows; r++) {
+    if (matrix[r][0] === 0) {
+      firstColHasZero = true;
+      break;
+    }
+  }
+
+  // Use first row and column to mark zeros
+  for (let i = 1; i < rows; i++) {
+    for (let j = 1; j < cols; j++) {
+      if (matrix[i][j] === 0) {
+        matrix[0][j] = 0;
+        matrix[i][0] = 0;
+      }
+    }
+  }
+
+  // Set zeros based on marks in the first row and column
+  for (let i = 1; i < rows; i++) {
+    for (let j = 1; j < cols; j++) {
+      if (matrix[0][j] === 0 || matrix[i][0] === 0) {
+        matrix[i][j] = 0;
+      }
+    }
+  }
+
+  // Handle first row
+  if (firstRowHasZero) {
+    for (let c = 0; c < cols; c++) {
+      matrix[0][c] = 0;
+    }
+  }
+
+  // Handle first column
+  if (firstColHasZero) {
+    for (let r = 0; r < rows; r++) {
+      matrix[r][0] = 0;
+    }
+  }
+
+  return matrix;
+};
+
+/**
+ * @param {number[][]} matrix
+ * @return {void} Do not return anything, modify matrix in-place instead.
+ */
+
+// 💪 My initial approach with Set...
+// Time Complexity: O(m * n)
+// Space Complexity: O(m + n)
+// var setZeroes = function (matrix) {
+//   let rows = new Set();
+//   let cols = new Set();
+
+//   for (let i = 0; i < matrix.length; i++) {
+//     for (let j = 0; j < matrix[0].length; j++) {
+//       if (matrix[i][j] === 0) {
+//         rows.add(i);
+//         cols.add(j);
+//       }
+//     }
+//   }
+
+//   for (row of rows) {
+//     matrix[row] = new Array(matrix[0].length).fill(0);
+//   }
+
+//   for (col of cols) {
+//     for (let row = 0; row < matrix.length; row++) {
+//       matrix[row][col] = 0;
+//     }
+//   }
+
+//   return matrix;
+// };
+
+

unique-paths/Jeehay28.js

@@ -0,0 +1,86 @@
+/**
+ * @param {number} m
+ * @param {number} n
+ * @return {number}
+ */
+
+// 🍎 DP
+// Time Complexity: O(m*n)
+// Space Complexity: O(n)
+
+// Row 0: [1, 1, 1, 1]
+// Row 1: [1, 2, 3, 4]
+// Row 2: [1, 3, 6, 10]
+
+// Initial dp: [1, 1, 1, 1]
+// left = 1 (always starts with 1 for the first column)
+
+// col = 1: left += dp[1] → left = 1 + 1 = 2 → dp[1] = left
+// col = 2: left += dp[2] → left = 2 + 1 = 3 → dp[2] = left
+// col = 3: left += dp[3] → left = 3 + 1 = 4 → dp[3] = left
+
+// dp after row 1: [1, 2, 3, 4]
+
+// Initial dp: [1, 2, 3, 4]
+// left = 1
+
+// col = 1: left += dp[1] → left = 1 + 2 = 3 → dp[1] = left
+// col = 2: left += dp[2] → left = 3 + 3 = 6 → dp[2] = left
+// col = 3: left += dp[3] → left = 6 + 4 = 10 → dp[3] = left
+
+// dp after row 2: [1, 3, 6, 10]
+
+var uniquePaths = function (m, n) {
+  let dp = new Array(n).fill(1);
+
+  for (let row = 1; row < m; row++) {
+    let left = 1;
+    for (let col = 1; col < n; col++) {
+      left += dp[col];
+      dp[col] = left;
+    }
+  }
+
+  return dp[n - 1];
+};
+
+/**
+ * @param {number} m
+ * @param {number} n
+ * @return {number}
+ */
+
+// 🍎 DFS
+// Time Complexity: O(m*n)
+// Space Complexity: O(m*n)
+
+// var uniquePaths = function (m, n) {
+//   const memo = {};
+
+//   const dfs = (row, col) => {
+//     if (row === m - 1 && col === n - 1) {
+//       return 1;
+//     }
+
+//     let cnt = 0;
+
+//     const key = `${row}, ${col}`;
+//     if (key in memo) {
+//       return memo[key];
+//     }
+
+//     if (row + 1 < m) {
+//       cnt += dfs(row + 1, col);
+//     }
+
+//     if (col + 1 < n) {
+//       cnt += dfs(row, col + 1);
+//     }
+
+//     memo[key] = cnt;
+
+//     return cnt;
+//   };
+
+//   return dfs(0, 0);
+// };