Use time.perf_counter_ns() instead of time.time_ns()

[sueskind]

First, thank you for this great project!

However, I fear, that there is some issue with the time measurement. Using time.get_clock_info() we can get this information:

>>> time.get_clock_info("time")
namespace(implementation='clock_gettime(CLOCK_REALTIME)', monotonic=False, adjustable=True, resolution=1e-09)
>>> time.get_clock_info("perf_counter")
namespace(implementation='clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC)', monotonic=True, adjustable=False, resolution=1e-09)

• time.time() and therefore time.time_ns() make no claim for being monotonic, meaning that it is possible that a later reading returns a lower number.
• The resolution may vary, up to only being 16 milliseconds, as reported in this Stack Overflow post.

Note: This is platform dependent, in this case run in Python 3.11.5 on Linux 6.5.6-arch2-1.

I would suggest switching time.time_ns() with time.perf_counter_ns() as is usually done for reliable performance measurements.

There is a PR open fixing this at #5.