You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
hmmm yeah you would think so actually. but the spatial patterns would remain the same and they're so vastly different i'm just a little concerned that we haven't done the preprocessing correctly!
Are they so different? They have extremely different resolutions (this is only resolved at the engineering step), but the peaks in precipitation look like they are in roughly the same spot, as well as the troughs.
the era5POS data when converted to monthly doesn't necessarily make sense to just upsample from
hourly
tomonthly
Because it's then Mean HOURLY precipitation over a month - when really we should be summing over the month.
Otherwise we get extremely different spatial patterns:
CHIRPS (mm/month)
ERA5POS (mm/hour mean for each month)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: