-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 313
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ctsm5.2.005 release note should be changed #2775
Comments
Yes. I thought that was the plan, focus on what's new in 5.2 (and if needed a note about the namelist updates that went into 001-005. |
How about this, from the 5.2.0 tag annotation (slightly modified)? CTSM 5.2: New surface datasets and mksurfdata_esmf tool to create them
New surface datasetsThe new surface datasets are incompatible with previous versions (for example the ctsm5.1 series)—ctsm5.2.0 and following versions can NOT use the previous ctsm5.1 datasets, and vice versa. See the section below about the new datasets used in their creation. Improvements in how landunits on coastal areas were also made. Fields added to the surface datasets in ctsm5.2:
Fields removed from the surface datasets in ctsm5.2:
New input data used for making surface datasets
New
|
@samsrabin thanks for pointing this out. You are right, to make these development release tags useful, we need to summarize the changes from the previous development release tag. So in this case primarily it would be ctsm5.2.0 notes. In looking at ctsm5.2.0 to ctsm5.2.005 changes it's primarily fixes needed to get ctsm5.2.0 functioning the way it was needed. One update worth mentioning is the regional and mesh file creation that went into ctsm5.2.003. You could mention the addition of 1979 and 1979-2026 datasets that went into ctsm5.2.004. |
Okay, how about this? Bold is new. CTSM 5.2: New surface datasets and mksurfdata_esmf tool to create them
New surface datasetsThe new surface datasets are incompatible with previous versions (for example the ctsm5.1 series)—ctsm5.2.0 and following versions can NOT use the previous ctsm5.1 datasets, and vice versa. See the section below about the new datasets used in their creation. Improvements in how landunits on coastal areas were also made. Fields added to the surface datasets in ctsm5.2:
Fields removed from the surface datasets in ctsm5.2:
New input data used for making surface datasets
New
|
I like this as a framework though for documenting what we think is the best scientifically stable and tested version to use. This means the process is something like this:
Loop: Over the following till done...
Whatever is then made the development release tag for that minor version includes a description that summarizes changes since the previous development release tag. So for example, I expect something like this to happen with ctsm5.3.0:
The idea then is that scientists would use ctsm5.3.007 as the recommended "last stable" vetted tag to use for their scientific development. It has a DOI associated with it, so it can be used for publications. Starting with the last development release tag will make it easier for everyone to bring those changes into CTSM main development. Thoughts on that process outlined above everyone? @samsrabin @wwieder @adrifoster @slevis-lmwg @olyson We'll also talk about this next Thursday... |
Yep, that's pretty much what I was thinking too! We could also mark ctsm5.3.0 as a pre-release, if we wanted, as long as that would still generate a DOI. |
It should focus on the stuff in 5.2, not the stuff from 5.2.001-005.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: