Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add timestamp to rpointer files, but make it backwards compatible with files without the timestamp #53

Closed
ekluzek opened this issue Oct 1, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #57
Assignees

Comments

@ekluzek
Copy link
Contributor

ekluzek commented Oct 1, 2024

CESM is going to a system wide change where the restart rpointer text files will have the simulation timestamp in the filename. However, the model will still be backwards compatible to use the older filenames without it. But, new rpointer files created by the model will have the timestamp in the filename.

PR's for CTSM and MOSART for this work are here:

ESCOMP/CTSM#2757
ESCOMP/MOSART#105

@ekluzek ekluzek moved this to In progress - release/externals / MOSART / RTM / mizu etc. tags in CTSM: Upcoming tags Nov 18, 2024
@slevis-lmwg
Copy link
Contributor

@ekluzek when ready to merge this to master, remember that I merged to master the ChangeLog update without making a new tag.

#56

@ekluzek ekluzek self-assigned this Dec 3, 2024
@ekluzek ekluzek moved this from Todo to In Progress in LMWG: Near Term Priorities Dec 3, 2024
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from In progress - release/externals / MOSART / RTM / mizu etc. tags to Done (non release/external) in CTSM: Upcoming tags Jan 4, 2025
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from In Progress to Done in LMWG: Near Term Priorities Jan 4, 2025
@ekluzek ekluzek moved this from Done (non release/external) to release/externals tags done in CTSM: Upcoming tags Jan 4, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Status: release/externals tags done
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants