-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 123
plugins: Correct the behavior for validation problems #4059
Comments
@markus2330 Please feel free to edit the description, if I got something wrong. |
Thank you for creating the issue! The description is very good. |
[FLOSS H1] Since there is already one example in refactoring the way in which the validation should be implemented, this solution should be able to be adapted to the different plugins. As far as i could see all elektra plugins are written in c, because of this i tagged this issue with lang/c is this correct? |
Some are C++. The one validation plugin in Java has its separate issue #4001. There are ruby and python plugins too but iirc they don't do validation. |
I mark this stale as it did not have any activity for one year. I'll close it in two weeks if no further activity occurs. If you want it to be alive again, ping by writing a message here or create a new issue with the remainder of this issue. |
I closed this now because it has been inactive for more than one year. If I closed it by mistake, please do not hesitate to reopen it or create a new issue with the remainder of this issue. |
Expected behavior
placements
:pregetstorage
andpostgetstorage
in their metadata. Otherwise ...Get()/...Set() won't be called.Affected plugins
Steps to fix the issue
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: