You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Run cargo local-registry --sync Cargo.lock registry
Update .cargo/config.toml according to the instructions, replacing crates.io with the local registry
Run cargo deny check
Every dependency will be reported with something like this:
warning[index-failure]: unable to check for yanked crates
┌─ /<censored>/workspace/examples/local_reg_yanked/Cargo.lock:15:1
│
15 │ tokio 1.38.0 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
│ ------------------------------------------------------------------ crate whose registry we failed to query
│
= the url '/<censored>/workspace/examples/local_reg_yanked/registry' is invalid
= tokio v1.38.0
└── local_reg_yanked v0.1.0
cargo-deny version
0.14.24
What OS were you running cargo-deny on?
Linux
Additional context
I don't know if a local registry mirror created with cargo-local-registry theoretically contains the information about yanked crates. If so, did the way cargo deny queries for it change? I think this still worked a while back with the same local registry setup.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Describe the bug
When using a local registry mirror setup with
cargo-local-registry
,cargo deny check
fails to check for yanked versions.To reproduce
cargo-local-registry
cargo local-registry --sync Cargo.lock registry
.cargo/config.toml
according to the instructions, replacing crates.io with the local registrycargo deny check
Every dependency will be reported with something like this:
cargo-deny version
0.14.24
What OS were you running cargo-deny on?
Linux
Additional context
I don't know if a local registry mirror created with
cargo-local-registry
theoretically contains the information about yanked crates. If so, did the waycargo deny
queries for it change? I think this still worked a while back with the same local registry setup.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: