-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 121
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Any way to use GitHub real name instead of username as the commit author? #167
Comments
At the moment the action just uses the |
Hard to say, I guess for not breaking anyone's existing flows a new boolean option would be best, where the default would be the existing behavior, e.g.
This boolean would only have an effect when |
Another idea would be letting users use a placeholder like, idk, |
Maybe the boolean would be less confusing. |
@all-contributors please add @ruohola for their idea |
I've put up a pull request to add @ruohola! 🎉 |
Ok, I've added a |
I think the email should still be the repo specific email though. |
Hmmm, why? |
Oh right right, currently is just uses |
ℹ️ Feature published in |
Why it is failing for me please? https://github.com/suntong/github_workflow/runs/3068857228?check_suite_focus=true thanks! |
@suntong Looking at your profile (https://github.com/suntong), you don't have a public display name or email... |
Ah, thanks @EndBug! |
Currently if a workflow step doesn't specify
author_name
, and I trigger the workflow, the Git commit author will show up as:This is of course already much nicer than having it just be some random GitHub bot email, so this is not a massive issue.
But, I'm still wondering is there any way to make it instead be?
(naturally without harcoding
author_name
since that would defeat the whole purpose)This would be nice in Git logs where the author name would then match the name that is in my other commits as well.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: