Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

NRTs: 'Earth (planet)' ... or 'globe' #33

Open
TrisSN opened this issue Aug 8, 2019 · 3 comments
Open

NRTs: 'Earth (planet)' ... or 'globe' #33

TrisSN opened this issue Aug 8, 2019 · 3 comments

Comments

@TrisSN
Copy link

TrisSN commented Aug 8, 2019

We restrict ourselves to GAZ for geographic locations, but frequently bump into the problem of GAZ lacking a global term. Some suggestions:

term: Earth (planet)
mirror from: http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/OMIT_0018724

term: globe [or, possibly, 'global', though using an adjective doesn't fit with other GAZ terms]

@TrisSN TrisSN changed the title NRTs: NRTs: 'Earth (planet)' ... or 'globe' Aug 8, 2019
@pbuttigieg
Copy link
Member

We currently link out to wikidata for Earth (as an instance of ENVO:"terrestrial planet")

http://www.ontobee.org/ontology/ENVO?iri=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.wikidata.org%2Fwiki%2FQ2

I think this is sensible as wikidata handles instance-level attributes well, while ENVO can treat the classes more systematically

@VarshaKhodiyar
Copy link

Hi Pierre,

Happy New Year!

We'd appreciate Earth as a location being added to the GAZ, since we often deal with global datasets for which the best location is Earth. As Tris mentions we had previously been using the Earth (planet) term from OMIT, but as this is a location we feel that it should be added to GAZ.

We appreciate that ENVO is primarily for classes rather than instances, so we are not requesting 'Earth' to be added to ENVO.

Many thanks,
Varsha

@lschriml
Copy link
Collaborator

lschriml commented Jan 7, 2020 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants