Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

revert: Add slots for filter actions" #7179

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 15, 2023
Merged

revert: Add slots for filter actions" #7179

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 15, 2023

Conversation

driskull
Copy link
Member

Reverts #7148

@driskull driskull changed the title Revert "feat(list): Add slots for filter actions" feat(list): Revert "Add slots for filter actions" Jun 15, 2023
@driskull driskull changed the title feat(list): Revert "Add slots for filter actions" chore: Revert "Add slots for filter actions" Jun 15, 2023
@driskull driskull marked this pull request as ready for review June 15, 2023 21:31
@driskull driskull requested a review from a team as a code owner June 15, 2023 21:31
@driskull driskull changed the title chore: Revert "Add slots for filter actions" revert: Add slots for filter actions" Jun 15, 2023
@jcfranco
Copy link
Member

Thanks for reverting, @driskull!

For context, this is being reverted to keep the June milestone patch-only. This will be reinstalled once the release is wrapped up.

@driskull driskull merged commit 667ee47 into master Jun 15, 2023
@driskull driskull deleted the revert-7148-dris0000/list-filter-actions branch June 15, 2023 21:42
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the 2023 June patch priorities milestone Jun 15, 2023
@calcite-admin calcite-admin mentioned this pull request Jun 15, 2023
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@jcfranco jcfranco jcfranco approved these changes

Assignees

@driskull driskull

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
2023 June patch priorities
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@driskull @jcfranco