New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Investigate replacing Puma with Falcom #1075

Closed

3 tasks

ferrisoxide opened this issue Jan 28, 2025 · 1 comment

Labels

spike

Collaborator

ferrisoxide commented Jan 28, 2025

Purpose of spike

There are [reports](https://github.com/[ermolaev/http_servers_bench](https://github.com/ermolaev/http_servers_bench) that the Ruby webserver Falcon is significantly faster than the default Puma. If this is true, and we can get it to work on Heroku without other issues (e.g. memory blow out) then we should consider migrating to it.

Potential solutions

See https://github.com/socketry/falcon

Acceptance Criteria

Presentation of working prototype
Lessons learned / outcome documented on wiki
Next steps, if applicable

ferrisoxide added the spike label

Collaborator Author

ferrisoxide commented Jan 30, 2025

Duplicate of #1076, closing

ferrisoxide closed this as completed

ferrisoxide closed this as completed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment