-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 96
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Databricks SQL support #236
Comments
Thanks for filing the issue! I didn't work with Databricks before. I briefly looked at documentation. The good news is that Databricks has structs and arrays, so adding this as a Logica engine appears doable. Unfortunately it looks like Databricks doesn't have a free tier. The free trial is limited to 14 days. So to implement it we'd need somebody who already pays for Databricks. Drop a note in this issue if you are interested in contributing to this. |
My team and I also looked into DatabricksSQL support, and we're doing some work right now to target Databricks at least partially. Some of it might be a bit crude, but we'd be happy to raise a PR to see if it could be useful to others once we're done. I'll follow up on this within several weeks. |
Hi @rvalek , |
Hi! |
hi @EvgSkv! |
Hi @KantorSerhiy ! |
@KantorSerhiy , btw, I did respond in the PR, it looks great! I left just a couple of requests to comment and it's good to be merged after that. |
hey @EvgSkv! |
@KantorSerhiy great! No worries! Just wanted to make sure your progress isn't blocked on me :-) |
Hi @samuell , we merged the baseline databricks dialect a couple of weeks ago. |
Based on recent work for clients, I for one would think support for Databricks SQL would be a huge deal. Seems to be used a little bit of everywhere.
I recently learned Databricks has teamed up with dbt to enable using their SQL templating tech for simplifying writing transformation logic, but Logica would be on a completely different level in my opinion.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: