Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

GuidPrefix and some other things #20

Open
NGBIT-de opened this issue Dec 2, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

GuidPrefix and some other things #20

NGBIT-de opened this issue Dec 2, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
question Further information is requested

Comments

@NGBIT-de
Copy link

NGBIT-de commented Dec 2, 2024

Hello,

many thanks for the great work.

I have a few things that I can't change, so I'm wondering if it's possible. I would like to remove the GuidPrefix completely, unfortunately if I leave it out I still have an ugly ID in the contacts. Would it also be possible to include the Department field?
And how can I set the filter so that only contacts with a phone number or mobile number are synced? And is it possible to set e.g. Company Contacts as the target folder?

Many thanks and best regards
Alex

@PrzemyslawKlys
Copy link
Member

GuidPrefix ensures the contacts' ID is known and tracked. Without the prefix, there's no way to guarantee matching contacts properly. I am not sure how you would proceed without it, and why would it even show up in your contacts unless you specifically show ID.

For others => you can use:

  • RequireEmailAddress property
  • DoNotRequireAccountEnabled
  • DoNotRequireAssignedLicenses

You can also use Sync-O365PersonalContactFilter with Mobile property like "xxx. I guess one could add a direct feature to RequireMobile as separate property similar to RequireEmailAddress.

Contaxcts Folder can be provided using FoldderName property.

Department is already requested:

@PrzemyslawKlys PrzemyslawKlys added the question Further information is requested label Dec 2, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants