Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Chat - Main composer is back on screen if swipe the keyboard down #17458

Closed
2 of 6 tasks
kbecciv opened this issue Apr 14, 2023 · 6 comments
Closed
2 of 6 tasks

Chat - Main composer is back on screen if swipe the keyboard down #17458

kbecciv opened this issue Apr 14, 2023 · 6 comments
Assignees
Labels
Bug Something is broken. Auto assigns a BugZero manager. Daily KSv2

Comments

@kbecciv
Copy link

kbecciv commented Apr 14, 2023

If you haven’t already, check out our contributing guidelines for onboarding and email contributors@expensify.com to request to join our Slack channel!


Issue found when executing PR #17221

Action Performed:

  1. Go https://staging.new.expensify.com/
    and login
  2. Go to any chat
  3. Send a couple of messages
  4. Start editing any message (main composer disappears)
  5. Swipe down the keyboard

Expected Result:

Main composer should not be visible while editing messages according to PR 17221

Actual Result:

Main composer is back on screen if swipe the keyboard down

Workaround:

Unknown

Platforms:

Which of our officially supported platforms is this issue occurring on?

  • Android / native
  • Android / Chrome
  • iOS / native
  • iOS / Safari
  • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
  • MacOS / Desktop

Version Number: 1.3.0.0

Reproducible in staging?: Yes

Reproducible in production?: Yes

If this was caught during regression testing, add the test name, ID and link from TestRail:

Email or phone of affected tester (no customers):

Logs: https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/4856

Notes/Photos/Videos: Any additional supporting documentation

Bug6017461_video_2023-04-13_22-39-03.mp4

Expensify/Expensify Issue URL:

Issue reported by: Applause - Internal Team

Slack conversation:

View all open jobs on GitHub

@kbecciv kbecciv added Daily KSv2 Bug Something is broken. Auto assigns a BugZero manager. labels Apr 14, 2023
@MelvinBot
Copy link

Triggered auto assignment to @muttmuure (Bug), see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/14418 for more details.

@MelvinBot
Copy link

MelvinBot commented Apr 14, 2023

Bug0 Triage Checklist (Main S/O)

  • This "bug" occurs on a supported platform (ensure Platforms in OP are ✅)
  • This bug is not a duplicate report (check E/App issues and #expensify-bugs)
    • If it is, comment with a link to the original report, close the issue and add any novel details to the original issue instead
  • This bug is reproducible using the reproduction steps in the OP. S/O
    • If the reproduction steps are clear and you're unable to reproduce the bug, check with the reporter and QA first, then close the issue.
    • If the reproduction steps aren't clear and you determine the correct steps, please update the OP.
  • This issue is filled out as thoroughly and clearly as possible
    • Pay special attention to the title, results, platforms where the bug occurs, and if the bug happens on staging/production.
  • I have reviewed and subscribed to the linked Slack conversation to ensure Slack/Github stay in sync

@muttmuure
Copy link
Contributor

This doesn't seem unexpected to me

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot added Overdue and removed Overdue labels Apr 17, 2023
@MelvinBot
Copy link

@muttmuure Uh oh! This issue is overdue by 2 days. Don't forget to update your issues!

@MelvinBot
Copy link

@muttmuure Still overdue 6 days?! Let's take care of this!

@muttmuure
Copy link
Contributor

I'm going to close this as I don't think it's unexpected.

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot removed the Overdue label Apr 24, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Bug Something is broken. Auto assigns a BugZero manager. Daily KSv2
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants