[HOLD for payment 2023-04-26] [HOLD for payment 2023-04-24] Focus is set to composer and I'm able to type in it when RHN is opened

[kavimuru]

If you haven’t already, check out our contributing guidelines for onboarding and email contributors@expensify.com to request to join our Slack channel!

---

Action Performed:

1. Go to Settings > Workspaces
2. Open any workspace
3. Go to Manage members
4. Invite some members if already not there
5. Click on Select all
6. Click on the Remove button
7. Click on the Remove button again to confirm
8. Start typing while the RHN is still open

Expected Result:

Not able to type on composer when RHN is opened

Actual Result:

Able to type on composer when RHN is opened

Workaround:

Can the user still use Expensify without this being fixed? Have you informed them of the workaround?

Platforms:

Which of our officially supported platforms is this issue occurring on?

• Android / native
• Android / Chrome
• iOS / native
• iOS / Safari
• MacOS / Chrome / Safari
• MacOS / Desktop

Version Number: 1.3.0
Reproducible in staging?: y
Reproducible in production?: n
If this was caught during regression testing, add the test name, ID and link from TestRail:
Email or phone of affected tester (no customers):
Logs: https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/4856
Notes/Photos/Videos: Any additional supporting documentation

Screen.Recording.2023-04-14.at.10.00.16.PM.mov

Recording.244.mp4

Expensify/Expensify Issue URL:
Issue reported by: @adeel0202
Slack conversation: https://expensify.slack.com/archives/C049HHMV9SM/p1681492657210339

View all open jobs on GitHub

[MelvinBot]

Triggered auto assignment to @flaviadefaria (Bug), see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/14418 for more details.

[MelvinBot]

Bug0 Triage Checklist (Main S/O)

• This "bug" occurs on a supported platform (ensure Platforms in OP are ✅)
• This bug is not a duplicate report (check E/App issues and #expensify-bugs)
  • If it is, comment with a link to the original report, close the issue and add any novel details to the original issue instead
• This bug is reproducible using the reproduction steps in the OP. S/O
  • If the reproduction steps are clear and you're unable to reproduce the bug, check with the reporter and QA first, then close the issue.
  • If the reproduction steps aren't clear and you determine the correct steps, please update the OP.
• This issue is filled out as thoroughly and clearly as possible
  • Pay special attention to the title, results, platforms where the bug occurs, and if the bug happens on staging/production.
• I have reviewed and subscribed to the linked Slack conversation to ensure Slack/Github stay in sync

[OSBotify]

👋 Friendly reminder that deploy blockers are time-sensitive ⏱ issues! Check out the open StagingDeployCash deploy checklist to see the list of PRs included in this release, then work quickly to do one of the following:

1. Identify the pull request that introduced this issue and revert it.
2. Find someone who can quickly fix the issue.
3. Fix the issue yourself.

[MelvinBot]

Triggered auto assignment to @roryabraham (Engineering), see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/4319 for more details.

[rushatgabhane]

duplicatee

being fixed here - #17475

[MelvinBot]

⚠️ Looks like this issue was linked to a Deploy Blocker here

If you are the assigned CME please investigate whether the linked PR caused a regression and leave a comment with the results.

If a regression has occurred and you are the assigned CM follow the instructions here.

If this regression could have been avoided please consider also proposing a recommendation to the PR checklist so that we can avoid it in the future.

[flaviadefaria]

@roryabraham can we close this?

[adeel0202]

Am I not eligible for the reporting bonus? because it was decided to revert the offending PR after I reported this bug. Here is the thread.

[flaviadefaria]

@adeel0202 yes you will be eligible. Thanks for the post above I hand't realized this was reported externally.

[roryabraham]

Added this issue to the test steps for #17475

[mountiny]

PR merged, awaiting Staging CP deploy

[MelvinBot]

⚠️ Looks like this issue was linked to a Deploy Blocker here

If you are the assigned CME please investigate whether the linked PR caused a regression and leave a comment with the results.

If a regression has occurred and you are the assigned CM follow the instructions here.

If this regression could have been avoided please consider also proposing a recommendation to the PR checklist so that we can avoid it in the future.

[PauloGasparSv]

P.R. was CP'd to staging here cc @mountiny

[MelvinBot]

Reviewing label has been removed, please complete the "BugZero Checklist".

[MelvinBot]

The solution for this issue has been 🚀 deployed to production 🚀 in version 1.3.0-2 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period 📆. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue:

• Revert: 17138 17360 listen keydown from user #17475

If no regressions arise, payment will be issued on 2023-04-24. 🎊

After the hold period is over and BZ checklist items are completed, please complete any of the applicable payments for this issue, and check them off once done.

• External issue reporter
• Contributor that fixed the issue
• Contributor+ that helped on the issue and/or PR

As a reminder, here are the bonuses/penalties that should be applied for any External issue:

• Merged PR within 3 business days of assignment - 50% bonus
• Merged PR more than 9 business days after assignment - 50% penalty

[MelvinBot]

BugZero Checklist: The PR fixing this issue has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed:

• [@roryabraham] The PR that introduced the bug has been identified. Link to the PR:
• [@roryabraham] The offending PR has been commented on, pointing out the bug it caused and why, so the author and reviewers can learn from the mistake. Link to comment:
• [@roryabraham] A discussion in #expensify-bugs has been started about whether any other steps should be taken (e.g. updating the PR review checklist) in order to catch this type of bug sooner. Link to discussion:
• [@flaviadefaria] Determine if we should create a regression test for this bug.
• [@roryabraham] If we decide to create a regression test for the bug, please propose the regression test steps to ensure the same bug will not reach production again.
• [@flaviadefaria] Link the GH issue for creating/updating the regression test once above steps have been agreed upon:

[mountiny]

Consolidating the payments to one place #17465

Closing this

[MelvinBot]

The solution for this issue has been 🚀 deployed to production 🚀 in version 1.3.1-3 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period 📆. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue:

• Revert: 17138 17360 listen keydown from user #17475

If no regressions arise, payment will be issued on 2023-04-26. 🎊

After the hold period is over and BZ checklist items are completed, please complete any of the applicable payments for this issue, and check them off once done.

• External issue reporter
• Contributor that fixed the issue
• Contributor+ that helped on the issue and/or PR

As a reminder, here are the bonuses/penalties that should be applied for any External issue:

• Merged PR within 3 business days of assignment - 50% bonus
• Merged PR more than 9 business days after assignment - 50% penalty

[MelvinBot]

BugZero Checklist: The PR fixing this issue has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed:

• [@roryabraham] The PR that introduced the bug has been identified. Link to the PR:
• [@roryabraham] The offending PR has been commented on, pointing out the bug it caused and why, so the author and reviewers can learn from the mistake. Link to comment:
• [@roryabraham] A discussion in #expensify-bugs has been started about whether any other steps should be taken (e.g. updating the PR review checklist) in order to catch this type of bug sooner. Link to discussion:
• [@flaviadefaria] Determine if we should create a regression test for this bug.
• [@roryabraham] If we decide to create a regression test for the bug, please propose the regression test steps to ensure the same bug will not reach production again.
• [@flaviadefaria] Link the GH issue for creating/updating the regression test once above steps have been agreed upon: