[HOLD for payment 2023-06-23] [HOLD for payment 2023-06-21] Not able to sign up with a new account

[kavimuru]

If you haven’t already, check out our contributing guidelines for onboarding and email contributors@expensify.com to request to join our Slack channel!

---

Action Performed:

1. Sign out if already signed in
2. Enter a new email that is not registered with Expensify
3. Click Continue

Expected Result:

Enter the magic code should be displayed

Actual Result:

Unlink account message is displayed, and can't even unlink

Workaround:

Can the user still use Expensify without this being fixed? Have you informed them of the workaround?

Platforms:

Which of our officially supported platforms is this issue occurring on?

• Android / native
• Android / Chrome
• iOS / native
• iOS / Safari
• MacOS / Chrome / Safari
• MacOS / Desktop

Version Number: 1.3.27-3
Reproducible in staging?: y
Reproducible in production?: n
If this was caught during regression testing, add the test name, ID and link from TestRail:
Email or phone of affected tester (no customers):
Logs: https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/4856
Notes/Photos/Videos: Any additional supporting documentation

Screen.Recording.2023-06-12.at.9.51.00.PM.mov

Expensify/Expensify Issue URL:
Issue reported by: @adeel0202
Slack conversation: https://expensify.slack.com/archives/C049HHMV9SM/p1686589249160379

View all open jobs on GitHub

[melvin-bot]

Triggered auto assignment to @dylanexpensify (Bug), see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/14418 for more details.

[melvin-bot]

Bug0 Triage Checklist (Main S/O)

• This "bug" occurs on a supported platform (ensure Platforms in OP are ✅)
• This bug is not a duplicate report (check E/App issues and #expensify-bugs)
  • If it is, comment with a link to the original report, close the issue and add any novel details to the original issue instead
• This bug is reproducible using the reproduction steps in the OP. S/O
  • If the reproduction steps are clear and you're unable to reproduce the bug, check with the reporter and QA first, then close the issue.
  • If the reproduction steps aren't clear and you determine the correct steps, please update the OP.
• This issue is filled out as thoroughly and clearly as possible
  • Pay special attention to the title, results, platforms where the bug occurs, and if the bug happens on staging/production.
• I have reviewed and subscribed to the linked Slack conversation to ensure Slack/Github stay in sync

[OSBotify]

👋 Friendly reminder that deploy blockers are time-sensitive ⏱ issues! Check out the open StagingDeployCash deploy checklist to see the list of PRs included in this release, then work quickly to do one of the following:

1. Identify the pull request that introduced this issue and revert it.
2. Find someone who can quickly fix the issue.
3. Fix the issue yourself.

[melvin-bot]

Triggered auto assignment to @srikarparsi (Engineering), see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/4319 for more details.

[mountiny]

Tested with production API and got the same result so this is App related regression

[mountiny]

Gonna take this one on, this Pr has introduced this regression #19498 I have confirmed locally by reverting the changes.

[Pujan92]

I think we need to validate first account.primaryLogin availability here, as for a new user we are getting the primaryLogin with the empty string in the onyx response. To summarize, primaryLogin value needs to be available for deciding isUnvalidatedSecondaryLogin.

App/src/pages/signin/SignInPage.js

Line 69 in 93957f0

const isUnvalidatedSecondaryLogin = hasLogin && !isPrimaryLogin && !isAccountValidated;

Seems the same we were doing earlier
https://github.com/Expensify/App/pull/19498/files#diff-c5a5c5593f21966821ea88d4630dd1c2b31bc851de5a3634f5d41ac8604d84abL79

[mountiny]

@Pujan92 I tried that but it on its own hasnt resolved the bug for me so there must be more

[Pujan92]

@mountiny I tried with this and seems it is working(where empty account.primaryLogin value is considered as a true for isPrimaryLogin).

[mountiny]

@Pujan92 @huzaifa-99 For urgency reasons and the fact this PR is large and the flow is super important I went ahead with the revert to unblock this.

Please comment on the original PR/ issue with proopsals how to solve this, I am sure we can reward you if your solution is indeed correct.

[melvin-bot]

Reviewing label has been removed, please complete the "BugZero Checklist".

[melvin-bot]

The solution for this issue has been 🚀 deployed to production 🚀 in version 1.3.27-7 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period 📆. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue:

• Revert "Migrate SignInPage to functional component" #20677

If no regressions arise, payment will be issued on 2023-06-21. 🎊

After the hold period is over and BZ checklist items are completed, please complete any of the applicable payments for this issue, and check them off once done.

• External issue reporter
• Contributor that fixed the issue
• Contributor+ that helped on the issue and/or PR

As a reminder, here are the bonuses/penalties that should be applied for any External issue:

• Merged PR within 3 business days of assignment - 50% bonus
• Merged PR more than 9 business days after assignment - 50% penalty

[melvin-bot]

BugZero Checklist: The PR fixing this issue has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed:

• [@mountiny] The PR that introduced the bug has been identified. Link to the PR:
• [@mountiny] The offending PR has been commented on, pointing out the bug it caused and why, so the author and reviewers can learn from the mistake. Link to comment:
• [@mountiny] A discussion in #expensify-bugs has been started about whether any other steps should be taken (e.g. updating the PR review checklist) in order to catch this type of bug sooner. Link to discussion:
• [@mountiny] Determine if we should create a regression test for this bug.
• [@mountiny] If we decide to create a regression test for the bug, please propose the regression test steps to ensure the same bug will not reach production again.
• [@dylanexpensify] Link the GH issue for creating/updating the regression test once above steps have been agreed upon:

[melvin-bot]

The solution for this issue has been 🚀 deployed to production 🚀 in version 1.3.28-5 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period 📆. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue:

• Revert "Migrate SignInPage to functional component" #20677

If no regressions arise, payment will be issued on 2023-06-23. 🎊

After the hold period is over and BZ checklist items are completed, please complete any of the applicable payments for this issue, and check them off once done.

• External issue reporter
• Contributor that fixed the issue
• Contributor+ that helped on the issue and/or PR

As a reminder, here are the bonuses/penalties that should be applied for any External issue:

• Merged PR within 3 business days of assignment - 50% bonus
• Merged PR more than 9 business days after assignment - 50% penalty

[melvin-bot]

BugZero Checklist: The PR fixing this issue has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed:

• [@mountiny] The PR that introduced the bug has been identified. Link to the PR:
• [@mountiny] The offending PR has been commented on, pointing out the bug it caused and why, so the author and reviewers can learn from the mistake. Link to comment:
• [@mountiny] A discussion in #expensify-bugs has been started about whether any other steps should be taken (e.g. updating the PR review checklist) in order to catch this type of bug sooner. Link to discussion:
• [@mountiny] Determine if we should create a regression test for this bug.
• [@mountiny] If we decide to create a regression test for the bug, please propose the regression test steps to ensure the same bug will not reach production again.
• [@dylanexpensify] Link the GH issue for creating/updating the regression test once above steps have been agreed upon:

[mountiny]

This was a straight revert.

Only payment is $250 due to @adeel0202

[dylanexpensify]

Nice, @adeel0202 mind applying here!

[adeel0202]

Applied, thanks.

[dylanexpensify]

Offer sent!

[dylanexpensify]

Payment sent, closing this one out

[luacmartins]

Thanks for the help!