-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[HOLD for payment 2023-11-07] [HOLD for payment 2023-11-06] [$500] Room - Room name field is not populated with existing room name in room name editor #30504
Comments
Job added to Upwork: https://www.upwork.com/jobs/~0113de9bd7f3295ef2 |
Triggered auto assignment to @garrettmknight ( |
Bug0 Triage Checklist (Main S/O)
|
Triggered auto assignment to Contributor-plus team member for initial proposal review - @ntdiary ( |
👋 Friendly reminder that deploy blockers are time-sensitive ⏱ issues! Check out the open
|
Triggered auto assignment to @dangrous ( |
ProposalPlease re-state the problem that we are trying to solve in this issue.The room name field isn't initialized with the current name of the room What is the root cause of that problem?While the current name is passed down via the defaultValue prop, it isn't passed through RoomNameInput to InputWrapper What changes do you think we should make in order to solve the problem?We can accept defaultName as a prop in RoomNameInput and initialize the value of InputWrapper to defaultName What alternative solutions did you explore? (Optional) |
If you are the assigned CME please investigate whether the linked PR caused a regression and leave a comment with the results. If a regression has occurred and you are the assigned CM follow the instructions here. If this regression could have been avoided please consider also proposing a recommendation to the PR checklist so that we can avoid it in the future. |
This is a quick fix but we may be reverting the PR that caused it (#28877) so holding for now. |
Please re-state the problem that we are trying to solve in this issue.
What changes do you think we should make in order to solve the problem?
What alternative solutions did you explore? (Optional) |
We're reverting the offending PR |
We can close this issue since we're CPing the revert |
The solution for this issue has been 🚀 deployed to production 🚀 in version 1.3.92-4 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period 📆. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue: If no regressions arise, payment will be issued on 2023-11-06. 🎊 After the hold period is over and BZ checklist items are completed, please complete any of the applicable payments for this issue, and check them off once done.
For reference, here are some details about the assignees on this issue:
|
BugZero Checklist: The PR fixing this issue has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed:
|
The solution for this issue has been 🚀 deployed to production 🚀 in version 1.3.93-1 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period 📆. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue: If no regressions arise, payment will be issued on 2023-11-07. 🎊 After the hold period is over and BZ checklist items are completed, please complete any of the applicable payments for this issue, and check them off once done.
For reference, here are some details about the assignees on this issue:
|
BugZero Checklist: The PR fixing this issue has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed:
|
If you haven’t already, check out our contributing guidelines for onboarding and email contributors@expensify.com to request to join our Slack channel!
Issue found when executing: PR #29771
Version Number: v1.3.92-0
Reproducible in staging?: Y
Reproducible in production?: N
If this was caught during regression testing, add the test name, ID and link from TestRail:
Email or phone of affected tester (no customers):
Logs: https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/4856
Expensify/Expensify Issue URL:
Issue reported by: Applause-Internal Team
Slack conversation: @
Action Performed:
Precondition: User has a room.
Expected Result:
The existing room name will be populated in the room name field.
Actual Result:
The room name field is not populated.
Workaround:
Unknown
Platforms:
Which of our officially supported platforms is this issue occurring on?
Screenshots/Videos
Android: Native
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: Native
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Bug6253013_1698395552568.20231027_100101.mp4
MacOS: Desktop
View all open jobs on GitHub
Upwork Automation - Do Not Edit
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: