Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Task – Members and settings options are present in deleted task RHP, chat isn’t archived #45829

Closed
3 of 6 tasks
lanitochka17 opened this issue Jul 20, 2024 · 12 comments
Closed
3 of 6 tasks
Assignees

Comments

@lanitochka17
Copy link

lanitochka17 commented Jul 20, 2024

If you haven’t already, check out our contributing guidelines for onboarding and email contributors@expensify.com to request to join our Slack channel!


Version Number: 9.0.10-2
Reproducible in staging?: Y
Reproducible in production?: N
If this was caught during regression testing, add the test name, ID and link from TestRail: https://expensify.testrail.io/index.php?/tests/view/4747510
Email or phone of affected tester (no customers): applausetester+jpcategory_1@applause.expensifail.com
Issue reported by: Applause - Internal Team

Action Performed:

  1. Go to https://staging.new.expensify.com/
  2. Log in
  3. Open chat with user B
  4. Create a task
  5. Open task detail and send a message
  6. Click on the header and delete the task

Expected Result:

Members and settings options disappears in deleted task RHP. Chat is archived

Actual Result:

Members and settings options are present in deleted task RHP

Workaround:

Unknown

Platforms:

Which of our officially supported platforms is this issue occurring on?

  • Android: Native
  • Android: mWeb Chrome
  • iOS: Native
  • iOS: mWeb Safari
  • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • MacOS: Desktop

Screenshots/Videos

Add any screenshot/video evidence

Bug6547692_1721435092930.Members_Settings.mp4

View all open jobs on GitHub

@lanitochka17 lanitochka17 added DeployBlockerCash This issue or pull request should block deployment DeployBlocker Indicates it should block deploying the API labels Jul 20, 2024
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Jul 20, 2024

Triggered auto assignment to @youssef-lr (DeployBlockerCash), see https://stackoverflowteams.com/c/expensify/questions/9980/ for more details.

Copy link
Contributor

👋 Friendly reminder that deploy blockers are time-sensitive ⏱ issues! Check out the open `StagingDeployCash` deploy checklist to see the list of PRs included in this release, then work quickly to do one of the following:

  1. Identify the pull request that introduced this issue and revert it.
  2. Find someone who can quickly fix the issue.
  3. Fix the issue yourself.

@lanitochka17
Copy link
Author

We think that this bug might be related to #vip-vsp

@mountiny
Copy link
Contributor

cc @srikarparsi this seems to be related to some of the closed reports logic, not sure if specifically this PR #45568

@srikarparsi
Copy link
Contributor

Hey! Yup, it's related to those changes but I think it's expected (that you can see the full report details when a task is cancelled). But @puneetlath if you could take a look at this too that would be great. The slack conversation where we talked about using state=MANUALREIMBURSED and status=CLOSED for cancelling tasks is here.

Because of the Closed & Archived changes, we show the full report details for all closed reports now (which I think is good unless I'm missing any edge cases). If we want to change this, then we should modify this check to include isClosedReport.

The other option is, if we want cancelling a task to mimic archiving a task (no longer can comment, can't see the full report details, floats to bottom of LHN, etc.), we could add the isArchived rNVP in Auth.

But I personally think this is expected behavior, let me know what you think @puneetlath. I can also bring it up in slack if you would like.

Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Jul 20, 2024

⚠️ Looks like this issue was linked to a Deploy Blocker here

If you are the assigned CME please investigate whether the linked PR caused a regression and leave a comment with the results.

If a regression has occurred and you are the assigned CM follow the instructions here.

If this regression could have been avoided please consider also proposing a recommendation to the PR checklist so that we can avoid it in the future.

@mountiny mountiny removed the DeployBlocker Indicates it should block deploying the API label Jul 20, 2024
@mountiny
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks, lets discuss here

@mountiny mountiny added Daily KSv2 and removed DeployBlockerCash This issue or pull request should block deployment Hourly KSv2 labels Jul 21, 2024
@mountiny
Copy link
Contributor

From the thread its clear this is not a blocker but still continuing the debate there

@srikarparsi srikarparsi self-assigned this Jul 23, 2024
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot added the Overdue label Jul 24, 2024
@youssef-lr
Copy link
Contributor

Not overdue

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot removed the Overdue label Jul 24, 2024
@srikarparsi
Copy link
Contributor

I think we should be good to close this out per this discussion? cc @mountiny @puneetlath

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot added the Overdue label Jul 29, 2024
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Jul 29, 2024

@youssef-lr, @srikarparsi Whoops! This issue is 2 days overdue. Let's get this updated quick!

@srikarparsi
Copy link
Contributor

Closing this out (Discussion)

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot removed the Overdue label Jul 29, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants