-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[PAID] [CRITICAL] [Advanced Approval Workflows] Implement <WorkspaceWorkflowsApprovalsExpensesFromPage />
for Member Selection
#45955
Comments
Hey! I’m Błażej Kustra from Software Mansion, an expert agency, and I’d like to work on this issue! |
@tgolen, @blazejkustra Uh oh! This issue is overdue by 2 days. Don't forget to update your issues! |
<WorkspaceWorkflowsApprovalsExpensesFromPage />
for Member Selection<WorkspaceWorkflowsApprovalsExpensesFromPage />
for Member Selection
|
The solution for this issue has been 🚀 deployed to production 🚀 in version 9.0.15-9 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period 📆. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue: If no regressions arise, payment will be issued on 2024-08-09. 🎊 For reference, here are some details about the assignees on this issue:
|
<WorkspaceWorkflowsApprovalsExpensesFromPage />
for Member Selection<WorkspaceWorkflowsApprovalsExpensesFromPage />
for Member Selection
The solution for this issue has been 🚀 deployed to production 🚀 in version 9.0.17-2 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period 📆. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue: If no regressions arise, payment will be issued on 2024-08-14. 🎊 For reference, here are some details about the assignees on this issue:
|
@tgolen, @blazejkustra Eep! 4 days overdue now. Issues have feelings too... |
Skipping the payment summary for this issue since all the assignees are employees or vendors. If this is incorrect, please manually add the payment summary SO. |
@tgolen, @blazejkustra 6 days overdue. This is scarier than being forced to listen to Vogon poetry! |
I’ve reviewed PR #46510, so should we have pending payment for this issue? |
Triggered auto assignment to @strepanier03 ( |
@strepanier03 Could you please assist with paying @suneox for a C+ review of the PR? |
@suneox, can you please link me to your Upwork profile? For some reason, I can't find you among our hires to send the contract. |
Scratch that, you come up under a different last initial but I found you now, all good. |
Offer sent, I'll check again in a couple hours to see if I can pay it. |
@strepanier03 Thank you, I have accepted an offer |
@tgolen, @strepanier03, @suneox, @blazejkustra Uh oh! This issue is overdue by 2 days. Don't forget to update your issues! |
Thanks @suneox, I've paid it and closed the contract. |
<WorkspaceWorkflowsApprovalsExpensesFromPage />
for Member Selection<WorkspaceWorkflowsApprovalsExpensesFromPage />
for Member Selection
If you are the assigned CME please investigate whether the linked PR caused a regression and leave a comment with the results. If a regression has occurred and you are the assigned CM follow the instructions here. If this regression could have been avoided please consider also proposing a recommendation to the PR checklist so that we can avoid it in the future. |
Coming from: #wave-control: advanced approval + workflows polish
Issue Owner
Current Issue Owner: @blazejkustraThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: