Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Secondary log in - Extra gap under validation button - Reported by: @parasharrajat #6460

Closed
isagoico opened this issue Nov 24, 2021 · 15 comments
Assignees
Labels
Daily KSv2 Engineering External Added to denote the issue can be worked on by a contributor Reviewing Has a PR in review

Comments

@isagoico
Copy link

If you haven’t already, check out our contributing guidelines for onboarding and email contributors@expensify.com to request to join our Slack channel!


Action Performed:

  1. Navigate to Settings
  2. Click on profile
  3. Click on add phone number (secondary log in)
  4. Check the button with dev tools

Expected Result:

Button area should only be consistent all around the button

Actual Result:

There's a empty gap below the button.
image

Workaround:

None needed, visual issue.

Platform:

Where is this issue occurring?

  • Web
  • iOS
  • Android
  • Desktop App
  • Mobile Web

Version Number: 1.1.16-6

Reproducible in staging?: Yes
Reproducible in production?: Yes

Logs: https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/4856

Notes/Photos/Videos: Any additional supporting documentation

Expensify/Expensify Issue URL:

Issue reported by: @parasharrajat
Slack conversation: https://expensify.slack.com/archives/C01GTK53T8Q/p1637656551367400

View all open jobs on GitHub

@MelvinBot
Copy link

Triggered auto assignment to @deetergp (Engineering), see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/4319 for more details.

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

Proposal

  1. Remove the Extra margin from the button. Padding is already applied from the FixedFooter component around it.
    style={[styles.mb2]}

@deetergp
Copy link
Contributor

Can be external and @parasharrajat's proposal takes care of it.

@deetergp deetergp added the External Added to denote the issue can be worked on by a contributor label Nov 24, 2021
@MelvinBot
Copy link

Triggered auto assignment to @jliexpensify (External), see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/8582 for more details.

@deetergp
Copy link
Contributor

Approved 👍

@MelvinBot MelvinBot removed the Overdue label Nov 29, 2021
@MelvinBot
Copy link

@deetergp, @jliexpensify Whoops! This issue is 2 days overdue. Let's get this updated quick!

@deetergp
Copy link
Contributor

deetergp commented Dec 6, 2021

Not overdue.

@jliexpensify
Copy link
Contributor

@deetergp just wanted to confirm for payment tomorrow:

It sounds like this is very similar to #6497

Am I paying Rajat $250 + $250 (bonus for reporting)? Or are we merging payment of the jobs together for Rajat?

Just want to make sure I'm not making a mistake and Rajat is getting paid accordingly, cheers!

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

parasharrajat commented Dec 6, 2021

My thoughts 20 cents 💸 .
This issue was reported earlier and solved in a different PR than 6497. 6497 was not discovered during this issue and it's possible that it was caused by some changes later on. PR for 6497 is just merged today.
Although, they sound similar they are talking about changes on two different pages. Both issues were reported separately and both of them will have separate PR. So I consider them separate.

But in the end, it's your call.

@deetergp
Copy link
Contributor

deetergp commented Dec 6, 2021

I agree with @parasharrajat — though they have a very similar fix, they are separate issues and should be treated as such.

@jliexpensify
Copy link
Contributor

Great, thanks for clearing that one up gents! Will pay Rajat $500 then.

@MelvinBot
Copy link

@deetergp, @jliexpensify Uh oh! This issue is overdue by 2 days. Don't forget to update your issues!

@jliexpensify
Copy link
Contributor

Got it in my calendar to pay tomorrow.

@jliexpensify
Copy link
Contributor

Paid + bonus, closed!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Daily KSv2 Engineering External Added to denote the issue can be worked on by a contributor Reviewing Has a PR in review
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants