-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Chat - After specific formatted message is sent, new messages appears above it #9438
Comments
Triggered auto assignment to @thienlnam ( |
Can easily reproduce on web sending the text snippet on production. This only affects the person sending the message not the person receiving it. I'm not seeing any indication the message didn't send successfully, checked the logs and nothing really stood out - the last message shown in the LHN is the correct message I'm also noticing that in the Onyx data, the stuck messages have indexes that are much higher than the other messages. This is likely why they keep getting pushed to the top. However, if you refresh the onyx data for that chat then it works as expected. |
It seems to be stuck as an optimisticID, and does not refresh correctly with the correct reportActionID once it is sent |
I am pretty sure this can be external, would start investigation here |
Triggered auto assignment to @NicMendonca ( |
Triggered auto assignment to Contributor-plus team member for initial proposal review - @mananjadhav ( |
Current assignee @thienlnam is eligible for the Exported assigner, not assigning anyone new. |
ProposalIssueThere are two reasons which are causing this issue:
SolutionThe easiest solution is to fix the WS API so that it returns the comment for markdown types. If that is not possible (It should be really), then we can refactor the |
@mananjadhav bump on the proposal review 👆 |
I
This is the same function used for non-formatted text as well. Are you saying the issue exists for any type of comment? As per the GH body, it seems it is a problem only for formatted text.
Are you suggesting that for the formatted text the API doesn't return any response? Even after success? and is that true only for formatted text? And what is |
@mananjadhav Yes. WS is websockets. For other comments, the issue does not exist because the websocket response is being sent correctly. |
@mananjadhav As confirmed in this chat: |
I would vote to take this internal. I'm not sure there is anything we can do in the client to investigate why the push data is failing to send... |
Whoops! This issue is 2 days overdue. Let's get this updated quick! |
potentially related issue #9370 |
This issue has not been updated in over 15 days. eroding to Monthly issue. P.S. Is everyone reading this sure this is really a near-term priority? Be brave: if you disagree, go ahead and close it out. If someone disagrees, they'll reopen it, and if they don't: one less thing to do! |
If you haven’t already, check out our contributing guidelines for onboarding and email contributors@expensify.com to request to join our Slack channel!
Action Performed:
and login with credentials
Additional information:
Architecture
_
Architectural diagram
Windows 95 was designed to be maximally compatible with existing MS-DOSand 16-bit Windows programs and device drivers while offering a more stable and better performing system.[12]%5B%5B13%5D%5D(https://wiki2.org/en/Windows_95%23cite_note-w95-archi-13
) The Windows 95 architecture is an evolution of Windows for Workgroups' 386 enhanced mode.Configuration Manager (CONFIGMG)Responsible for implementing Plug and Play functionality; monitoring hardware configuration changes; detecting devices using bus enumerators_; and allocating I/O ports, IRQs, DMA channels and memory in a conflict-free fashion.[14]Installable File System Manager (Input/Output Subsystem)Coordinates access to supported file systems. Windows 95 initially shipped with support for FAT12, FAT16, the VFAT extension, ISO 9660 (CDFS), Joliet and network redirectors, with later releases supporting FAT32.[15]
Expected Result:
All sent messages should be displayed in the correct order
Actual Result:
Once specific formatted message is sent - all new sent messages appears below that message
Workaround:
Unknown
Platform:
Where is this issue occurring?
Version Number: 1.1.76.2
Reproducible in staging?: Yes
Reproducible in production?: Yes
Email or phone of affected tester (no customers): yuriy.turbo+ch11@gmail.com/Aa111111
Logs: https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/4856
Notes/Photos/Videos: Any additional supporting documentation
Bug5608473_Screen_Recording_2022-06-14_at_01.58.35.mp4
Expensify/Expensify Issue URL:
Issue reported by: Applause - Internal Team
Slack conversation:
View all open jobs on GitHub
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: