Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Naming conventions when resolving xref keyword #36

Open
mkuehbach opened this issue Jun 26, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Naming conventions when resolving xref keyword #36

mkuehbach opened this issue Jun 26, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@mkuehbach
Copy link
Collaborator

Relevant for semantic mapping after Sept NIAC meeting:
For the conversion direction yaml2nxdl xref is currently resolved as such:
f"This concept is related to term {xref_entries.get('term', 'NO TERM')}_ "
f"of the {xref_entries.get('spec', 'NO TERM')} standard.\n\n"

But that xref is not necessarily always a "standard" but sometimes an "ontology",
therefore suggesting to revise this at some point.

@mkuehbach mkuehbach changed the title f"This concept is related to term {xref_entries.get('term', 'NO TERM')}_ " f"of the {xref_entries.get('spec', 'NO TERM')} standard.\n\n" Naming conventions when resolving xref keyword Jun 26, 2024
@lukaspie
Copy link
Collaborator

We could also think about having another keyword for xref that describes what kind of entity we are referencing, i.e., ontology, standard, defined vocabulary, etc.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants