You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Relevant for semantic mapping after Sept NIAC meeting:
For the conversion direction yaml2nxdl xref is currently resolved as such:
f"This concept is related to term {xref_entries.get('term', 'NO TERM')}_ "
f"of the {xref_entries.get('spec', 'NO TERM')} standard.\n\n"
But that xref is not necessarily always a "standard" but sometimes an "ontology",
therefore suggesting to revise this at some point.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
mkuehbach
changed the title
f"This concept is related to term {xref_entries.get('term', 'NO TERM')}_ " f"of the {xref_entries.get('spec', 'NO TERM')} standard.\n\n"
Naming conventions when resolving xref keyword
Jun 26, 2024
We could also think about having another keyword for xref that describes what kind of entity we are referencing, i.e., ontology, standard, defined vocabulary, etc.
Relevant for semantic mapping after Sept NIAC meeting:
For the conversion direction yaml2nxdl xref is currently resolved as such:
f"This concept is related to term
{xref_entries.get('term', 'NO TERM')}
_ "f"of the {xref_entries.get('spec', 'NO TERM')} standard.\n\n"
But that xref is not necessarily always a "standard" but sometimes an "ontology",
therefore suggesting to revise this at some point.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: