Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Newton solver for blocked problems #3352

Open
jorgensd opened this issue Aug 16, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Newton solver for blocked problems #3352

jorgensd opened this issue Aug 16, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@jorgensd
Copy link
Member

jorgensd commented Aug 16, 2024

Describe new/missing feature

Currently, we have no simple interface for solving non-linear blocked problems, such as mixed-dimensional problems.
I would suggest adding something that helps the user with this task, as it is far from trivial.

Suggested user interface

class NewtonSolver:
    max_iterations: int
    bcs: list[dolfinx.fem.DirichletBC]
    A: PETSc.Mat
    b: PETSc.Vec
    J: dolfinx.fem.Form
    b: dolfinx.fem.Form
    dx: PETSc.Vec

    def __init__(
        self,
        F: list[dolfinx.fem.form],
        J: list[list[dolfinx.fem.form]],
        w: list[dolfinx.fem.Function],
        bcs: list[dolfinx.fem.DirichletBC] | None = None,
        max_iterations: int = 5,
        petsc_options: dict[str, str | float | int | None] = None,
        problem_prefix="newton",
    ):
        self.max_iterations = max_iterations
        self.bcs = [] if bcs is None else bcs
        self.b = dolfinx.fem.petsc.create_vector_block(F)
        self.F = F
        self.J = J
        self.A = dolfinx.fem.petsc.create_matrix_block(J)
        self.dx = self.A.createVecLeft()
        self.w = w
        self.x = dolfinx.fem.petsc.create_vector_block(F)

        # Set PETSc options
        opts = PETSc.Options()
        if petsc_options is not None:
            for k, v in petsc_options.items():
                opts[k] = v

        # Define KSP solver
        self._solver = PETSc.KSP().create(self.b.getComm().tompi4py())
        self._solver.setOperators(self.A)
        self._solver.setFromOptions()

        # Set matrix and vector PETSc options
        self.A.setFromOptions()
        self.b.setFromOptions()

    def solve(self, tol=1e-6, beta=1.0):
        i = 0

        while i < self.max_iterations:
            dolfinx.cpp.la.petsc.scatter_local_vectors(
                self.x,
                [si.x.petsc_vec.array_r for si in self.w],
                [
                    (
                        si.function_space.dofmap.index_map,
                        si.function_space.dofmap.index_map_bs,
                    )
                    for si in self.w
                ],
            )
            self.x.ghostUpdate(
                addv=PETSc.InsertMode.INSERT, mode=PETSc.ScatterMode.FORWARD
            )

            # Assemble F(u_{i-1}) - J(u_D - u_{i-1}) and set du|_bc= u_D - u_{i-1}
            with self.b.localForm() as b_local:
                b_local.set(0.0)
            constants_L = [form and dolfinx.cpp.fem.pack_constants(form._cpp_object) for form in self.F]
            coeffs_L = [dolfinx.cpp.fem.pack_coefficients(form._cpp_object) for form in self.F]

            constants_a = [
                    [
                        dolfinx.cpp.fem.pack_constants(form._cpp_object)
                        if form is not None
                        else np.array([], dtype=PETSc.ScalarType)
                        for form in forms
                    ]
                    for forms in self.J
                ]

            coeffs_a = [
                    [{} if form is None else dolfinx.cpp.fem.pack_coefficients(form._cpp_object) for form in forms]
                    for forms in self.J
                ]

            dolfinx.fem.petsc.assemble_vector_block(
                self.b, self.F, self.J, bcs=self.bcs, x0=self.x, scale=-1.0, coeffs_a=coeffs_a, constants_a=constants_a, coeffs_L=coeffs_L, constants_L=constants_L
            )
            self.b.ghostUpdate(
                PETSc.InsertMode.INSERT_VALUES, PETSc.ScatterMode.FORWARD
            )

            # Assemble Jacobian
            self.A.zeroEntries()
            dolfinx.fem.petsc.assemble_matrix_block(self.A, self.J, bcs=self.bcs, constants=constants_a, coeffs=coeffs_a)

            self._solver.solve(self.b, self.dx)
            # self._solver.view()
            assert (
                self._solver.getConvergedReason() > 0
            ), "Linear solver did not converge"
            offset_start = 0
            for s in self.w:
                num_sub_dofs = (
                    s.function_space.dofmap.index_map.size_local
                    * s.function_space.dofmap.index_map_bs
                )
                s.x.petsc_vec.array_w[:num_sub_dofs] -= (
                    beta * self.dx.array_r[offset_start : offset_start + num_sub_dofs]
                )
                s.x.petsc_vec.ghostUpdate(
                    addv=PETSc.InsertMode.INSERT, mode=PETSc.ScatterMode.FORWARD
                )
                offset_start += num_sub_dofs
            # Compute norm of update

            correction_norm = self.dx.norm(0)
            print(f"Iteration {i}: Correction norm {correction_norm}")
            if correction_norm < tol:
                break
            i += 1

    def __del__(self):
        self.A.destroy()
        self.b.destroy()
        self.dx.destroy()
        self._solver.destroy()
        self.x.destroy()
@jorgensd jorgensd added the enhancement New feature or request label Aug 16, 2024
@RemDelaporteMathurin
Copy link
Contributor

There is only one tolerance here as opposed to the current behaviour of NewtonSolver with absolute and relative tolerances. Is this something that can be added?

@jorgensd
Copy link
Member Author

There is only one tolerance here as opposed to the current behaviour of NewtonSolver with absolute and relative tolerances. Is this something that can be added?

Once can customize this method for what kind of tolerances and convergence criteria that should be met.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants