Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

RichTextFX controls from FXML? #443

Closed
robross0606 opened this issue Feb 23, 2017 · 7 comments · Fixed by #466
Closed

RichTextFX controls from FXML? #443

robross0606 opened this issue Feb 23, 2017 · 7 comments · Fixed by #466

Comments

@robross0606
Copy link

Is it possible to reference RichTextFX controls from FXML?

@JordanMartinez
Copy link
Contributor

I'm not sure, but I'd guess that Tomas wouldn't go out of his way to support it either based on a similar issue he addressed in Flowless

@alt-grr
Copy link

alt-grr commented Feb 24, 2017

@JordanMartinez But as @hwaite has written, you can use javafx.beans.NamedArg annotation instead of adding no-arg constructor.

@JordanMartinez
Copy link
Contributor

@kuc Thanks for pointing that out. I haven't read through that thread in a long time, but I just remembered it since he mentioned FXML.

@JordanMartinez
Copy link
Contributor

Closed by #466.

@JordanMartinez
Copy link
Contributor

On second thought, does this mean GenericEditableStyledDocumentBase and its subclasses also need to use NamedArg?

@JordanMartinez
Copy link
Contributor

@robross0606 Let me know if I need to merge #467. I'm not familiar with FXML.

@JordanMartinez
Copy link
Contributor

@robross0606 Since I haven't heard back from you (and since no one else has said otherwise), I'm guessing that the EditableStyledDocuments don't also need to be FXML ready, and am thus closing this issue.
Reopen if it does and we can fix that issue quickly.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants