-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 151
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
trimgalore and cutadapt in two steps? #147
Comments
Hi @marwa38 I am just trying to understand exactly what you were trying to achieve here. Just to say, Trim Galore attempts to identify the adapter used in your system, by looking for exact matches either the Illumina standard, Nextera or Illumina small RNA adapters. If there is a clear 'winner', that adapter sequence is selected for removal (without any IUPAC ambiguity codes). Also, the sequences you specified are lacking the Is this the answer you were looking for? |
Thank you for the discussion @FelixKrueger
Yeah I was having Nextera adaptors which is good trimGalore have removed.
I didn't mention any sequences in trimGalore code What do you mean regarding "A"? you mean that I can't use V3-V4 primers that I above mentioned in my cutadapt codes to remove primers? you mean that TrimGalore |
I was referring the code snippets in the original post:
but at second glance these sequences to not appear to be related to adapters after all - so please just ignore the comment about A-tailing. I suppose my question is: why do you want to remove primer sequences at all? Trim Galore is really only meant to remove read-through adapter contamination and poor sequences from the 3'-end. Do you have a setup that requires you to remove and filter a lot more, including biases at the starts as well as ends of sequences, adapter contamination plus primer sequences? |
Thanks for your reply and sorry for responding after a week @FelixKrueger . Thank you |
I just took a look at the dada2 workflow for ITS amplicon sequencing. I have to admit that I really don't feel that I know enough about 16S sequencing to give much advice on what to do, but it would appear that trimming of the amplicon primer sequences seems necessary. This doesn't necessarily mean that you couldn't accomplish your goals with Trim Galore, but you would have to know exactly what you want to be doing. Maybe it would just be easier to follow their workflow instead? |
Thanks for your comments |
Hi team
I know that trimgalore is a wrapper around cutadapt but I want to check what I ran is considered fine
I ran trimgalore to remove adaptors and primers at 5' and 3' ends but then
I found that I need to check for primers within the sequences themselves and I found and I removed them
Things are ok that I did my analysis in that way? I don't want to reran the analysis again but I want to make sure that this is fine.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: