We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
According to the most recent vignettes (found https://www.bioconductor.org/packages/devel/bioc/vignettes/CoGAPS/inst/doc/CoGAPS.html and https://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/vignettes/CoGAPS/inst/doc/CoGAPS.html) CoGAPS 3.8 and 3.9 should be the most recent versions. However, when I install from Github, 3.7 is the version that I get from both the "master" and "develop" branches. Wondering if I am getting the wrong version, or if the vignettes are incorrect. I have also heard that there is an issue with the sparseOptimization flag, which I will set to "FALSE" for the time being. Let us know when this feature is ready to be used! Thanks so much!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I have upgraded to R 4.0.1 and followed the installation instructions and obtained 3.9
https://www.bioconductor.org/packages/devel/bioc/html/CoGAPS.html
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
According to the most recent vignettes (found https://www.bioconductor.org/packages/devel/bioc/vignettes/CoGAPS/inst/doc/CoGAPS.html and https://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/vignettes/CoGAPS/inst/doc/CoGAPS.html) CoGAPS 3.8 and 3.9 should be the most recent versions. However, when I install from Github, 3.7 is the version that I get from both the "master" and "develop" branches. Wondering if I am getting the wrong version, or if the vignettes are incorrect. I have also heard that there is an issue with the sparseOptimization flag, which I will set to "FALSE" for the time being. Let us know when this feature is ready to be used! Thanks so much!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: