Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
I tihnk we should remove this line entirely. We currently don't have a need for this relationship (or else we would have sorted this by now 😅 ) and we probably shouldn't be adding relationships in the schema until we find a need for them. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Is there an issue associated with this TODO? Is the code still needed or can it be removed?
gc-digital-talent/api/graphql/schema.graphql
Line 232 in a76b516
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions