We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
It would be much nicer and less error prone to implement the vars_parity in the UserVariables (and DiagnosticVariables) namespaces, e.g.
namespace UserVariables { static constexpr char const *variable_names[NUM_VARS] = { "psi", "V1_0", "V2_0", "V3_0", "U_0", "phi_0", "Pi_0", "K_0", "A11_0", "A12_0", "A13_0", "A22_0", "A23_0", "A33_0"}; static constexpr std::array<int, NUM_VARS> const vars_parity = { 0, 1, 2, 3, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 4, 6, 0, 5, 0}; } // namespace UserVariables
And have the Boundary conditions default to these values. However, it seems inevitable that it would break existing code.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
KAClough
No branches or pull requests
It would be much nicer and less error prone to implement the vars_parity in the UserVariables (and DiagnosticVariables) namespaces, e.g.
And have the Boundary conditions default to these values. However, it seems inevitable that it would break existing code.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: