Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat (admin-ui) : add UMA scope in scopes form #346

Closed
duttarnab opened this issue Jul 27, 2022 · 2 comments
Closed

feat (admin-ui) : add UMA scope in scopes form #346

duttarnab opened this issue Jul 27, 2022 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
comp-admin-ui Component affected by issue or PR enhancement New feature or request kind-feature Issue or PR is a new feature request

Comments

@duttarnab
Copy link
Contributor

duttarnab commented Jul 27, 2022

Add UMA scope radio in scopes form.

  • change to UMA Scope should not be allowed post-creation. It means Edit mode there should not be apply cancel button (see spontaneous scope)

Field mapping with config-api
endpoint : (/jans-config-api/api/v1/scopes)
id --> id
inum --> inum
Display Name --> displayName
Icon URL--> iconUrl
Authorization Policies --> umaAuthorizationPolicies

Associated Clients --> clients array (inum)
Creation time --> creationDate
Creator --> display creatorType and creatorId

image

@duttarnab duttarnab added enhancement New feature or request comp-admin-ui Component affected by issue or PR kind-feature Issue or PR is a new feature request labels Jul 27, 2022
@duttarnab duttarnab assigned moabu and mjatin-dev and unassigned moabu Jul 27, 2022
@duttarnab
Copy link
Contributor Author

For UMA and Spontaneous scopes, use the displayName of the client for associated clients… if none, use the client_id.
image

@duttarnab
Copy link
Contributor Author

Done

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
comp-admin-ui Component affected by issue or PR enhancement New feature or request kind-feature Issue or PR is a new feature request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants