Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Should SCIM PUT account null values? #5

Open
jgomer2001 opened this issue May 31, 2019 · 0 comments
Open

Should SCIM PUT account null values? #5

jgomer2001 opened this issue May 31, 2019 · 0 comments
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@jgomer2001
Copy link
Collaborator

jgomer2001 commented May 31, 2019

From community member (May 29th 2019):

Using PATCH is definitely on the table, but just requires more work [...] I'd like to suggest a setting to disable ignoring null in PUT requests for SCIM. That way, if an implementation only adds null values deliberately to a request, it would be possible to unassign attributes through PUT, making for less deviation from the standard. This would, of course, need to be a setting to avoid breaking any existing implementations that rely on the current functionality. I'm with you on the PUT implementation being less destructive than what is usual, but being able to remove attributes with it would be nice.

@jgomer2001 jgomer2001 self-assigned this May 31, 2019
@jgomer2001 jgomer2001 transferred this issue from GluuFederation/oxTrust Jul 30, 2020
@jgomer2001 jgomer2001 added this to the 5.0 milestone Dec 11, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant