Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Move viewport audit logic to computed artifact #7084

Closed
mattzeunert opened this issue Jan 24, 2019 · 5 comments
Closed

Move viewport audit logic to computed artifact #7084

mattzeunert opened this issue Jan 24, 2019 · 5 comments
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@mattzeunert
Copy link
Contributor

mattzeunert commented Jan 24, 2019

Tap targets and font size audit currently call the viewport audit, and we don't like audits calling each other.

#5846 (comment)

@brendankenny
Copy link
Member

We should maybe expose some sort of notApplicable in the result from that computed artifact if the test was done with a desktop form factor. Since this will be at least three audits using it, we may not want to replicate it in each one, but it might also be overkill.

See #6687 and #5846 (comment)

@patrickhulce were you just talking about form factor information on the audit context? Or was that fixes for the report Runtime settings I'm mixing up with this?

@patrickhulce
Copy link
Collaborator

@patrickhulce were you just talking about form factor information on the audit context? Or was that fixes for the report Runtime settings I'm mixing up with this?

Yep I just filed #7043 that's very similar to this concern. Separately, I also want to fix runtime settings that I'm fairly vocal about in chat but I haven't collected my thoughts enough into an issue yet haha :)

@chrisandflora

This comment has been minimized.

@mattzeunert
Copy link
Contributor Author

Should we create a viewportMeta computed artifact for this, which basically does the logic of the viewport audit and exposes the results?

@patrickhulce #7043 is just similar but wouldn't actually share code, right?

@patrickhulce
Copy link
Collaborator

Yeah @mattzeunert I don't think they would end up sharing code, just related 👍

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants