-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update from Docker to OCI metadata broke builds with maven-jib #1259
Comments
Yeah support for oci-indexes was added 6 months ago in jib. I recommend you just update your version of Jib. In the meantime, if you need to the older build of gcr.io/distroless/java17-debian11... the last docker based build was: |
You can also point to the architecture specific version (which is not a list) |
Yeah, I do realize that we'll need to update to |
Also, I just want to say: Thank you for responding so quickly, and with helpful information. I really appreciate it. |
Yeah no problem, please let us know if the transition causes anymore breakages and we can find a solution. |
Yeah I didn't realize this would cause breakages, so I didn't make an annoucement. But usually major changes are announced on distroless-users@googlegroups.com |
Perfect: we'll be sure to hop on the mailing list. And, I don't anticipate that anything will go wrong, but I'll be sure to let you know if it does. Thanks again! |
Describe the bug
This PR changed the metadata type of the distroless image from docker to OCI. It is breaking many builds accross our organization because we use the
maven-jib-plugin:3.2.0
from last march, which doesn't support the OCI metadata format. Since there are no tags maintained for older versions of the distroless containers (specificallyjava17-debian11
), we cannot refer to an older version (from yesterday, even) in order to temporarily fix our builds while we perform an investigation into the major-version update of the jib plugin. Was there an announcement regarding this metadata change? if so, where can I look for information like this in the future?To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior: run a skaffold build using the older JIB version-
Expected behavior
There to be an announcement, notice of deprecation, or some communication.
Console Output
Additional context
Happy to provide any required context
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: