-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[30k]: Open source onboarding #72
Comments
Weekly Update What has been done?
Status Risk Deliverable Date What will be done? |
Weekly Update What has been done?
Status Risk Deliverable Date What will be done?
|
Weekly Update What has been done?
Status Risk Deliverable Date What will be done?
Currently Blocked on developing a clear onboarding process for public users to access and use development tools. |
@EOKENAVA @margaretspring please provide more details on what the blocker is- why is the onboarding process blocked? what will unblock it? cc @lucasmbrown-usds |
Currently awaiting guidance on usage of Google Forms to collect and store open source developer data. @lucasmbrown-usds said that they should get back to us by Friday. Use of this tool is blocking work because we need to know where and how we will be able to collect and store data on developers who want to sign up to be a part of the community. We selected Google Forms after a conversation with Remy DeCausemaker as the preferred tool for this. |
Awesome, thank you Brandon!! |
Weekly Update What has been done?
Status Risk Deliverable Date What will be done?
|
Weekly Update What has been done?
Questions
Status Risk
Deliverable Date What will be done?
|
@sarahknoppA6 - Who can address the question about the labeling that I asked above? |
@margaretspring I'm not able to open the link you provided. But maybe @widal001 can take a look at this- do you know which pieces of it are out of sync? |
@margaretspring The name was changed to "Open source onboarding" from "Open source group kickoff" as part of some discussions that Lucas, Sumi, and Aaron and I had in which we updated several of the 30k names. Part of the motivation for changing this to "onboarding" from "kickoff" was that we had descoped setting up regular meetings, and instead focused on the open source tool onboarding process. And with regards to the description being out of sync would you mind highlighting which parts seemed inconsistent? As far as I could tell the following matched:
|
We confirmed at ToT last week that completion of this 30k is on track for tomorrow. I was looking through the associated 10ks and it looks like there are several tasks still outstanding. (I do understand that tasks associated with procurement and the public wiki domain link may lag based on previous updates.) I'm not able to easily tell if these just need to be updated, are no longer relevant, or will be completed. Would you mind re-confirming this delivery date, @sumiat and @margaretspring ? I'm working on my slides for OG leadership today and want to confirm we're expecting this 30k to be finalized tomorrow. Time permitting, it may be helpful to have a meeting where we review the 30k together and close it out at the onsite on Thursday. |
This 30k will not be done by tomorrow due to blockers that are somewhat outside our control. It will take 1 more sprint to complete. Unfinished Items with reasoning of delay:
To summarize: |
Thanks for the very thorough update. On item 1, I can also setup a Zoom Pro meeting to unblock us, and I'm sure there are a few other Zoom licenses floating around here as well. We can do better than Slack group calls. On item 2, is this really a dependency of onboarding the public? we can actually start testing access to the wiki (and which other services?) from those networks now. Onboarding members of the public won't help us identify whether the White House or HHS networks block the site. On item 6, I wasn't aware I was a blocker until this update. Can we chat async about it? On item 9, I'm not sure I understand the proposal here and why there's a delay. Tickets "will be flagged once we have users to work them so that we do not delay active eng work." Are you saying we're outsourcing tickets to open source users that need to get done in the next 1-2 sprints? I'm not sure anyone's going to jump in immediately and work on our tickets, so hopefully we're not tagging tickets as #help-wanted that we would need to get done anytime soon. IMHO, they should all be "nice to haves", not "must haves" on any time table. On item 10, can we talk about the process of removing this criteria from the definition of done for the 30k? I'm not opposed to that move, I just want to make sure we're involving the whole P&D team (@sarahknoppA6 , @widal001 , myself) in any downscoping of the 30ks after scope is locked and agreed to. |
Thanks Lucas for the response, reading through the feedback there is a lot that can be improved on going forward. I apologize for getting desynced on this body of work. For item 1: This sounds good, I'll reach out so we can chat about the process for setting up these calls. For item 2: I believe that this may have been a miscommunication on my part. Currently the wiki is still blocked with the custom domain, so as soon as this is unblocked I'll reach out to determine a good set of users to verify that our tools are accessible on those networks. For item 6: I apologize, I did not want to paint you as a blocker. I may have worded that poorly. I'll reach out to you async and we can chat. My understanding is that you had a cohort of users that you were interested in onboarding. On item 9: again, I worded this poorly. Aaron and I will work on creating a list of marked work. I was worried about marking tickets that were going to be picked up by internal developers before an open source developer would be onboarded. On item 10: I could have worded this better. It will not be descoped from the epic. It will be pushed back to after we are onboarding open source contributors since we want to make that happen as soon as possible. Again, I appreciate the responses and we can chat more about any of these items. I was trying to be as succinct as possible while remaining thorough and accountable to the work and I think that some of my wording was a bit off. Thanks for the understanding from everyone. |
Weekly Update 4/3 What has been done?
Status Risk Blocked - We are experiencing technical delays on getting the custom domain for wiki.simpler.grants.gov. I am working with Cloudflare, Terrance, and GitBook to try and resolve this. Blocked work includes:
Deliverable Date What will be done?
|
Weekly Update 4/10 What has been done?
Status Risk Blocked - We are experiencing technical delays on getting the custom domain for wiki.simpler.grants.gov. I am working with Cloudflare, Terrance, and GitBook to try and resolve this. Blocked work includes:
Deliverable Date What will be done?
|
Updated the format of this ticket to reduce discrepancies with the deliverable spec. |
Weekly Update 4/17 What has been done?
Status Risk Blocked - We have reached out to 8 individuals to be a part of the initial Open Source Community for SGG. Of those 8, only 5 agreed to be a part of the community at this time. We sent them onboarding instructions and are awaiting them joining. We have gotten 1 fully onboarded and are awaiting more folks to complete the process. Deliverable Date What will be done?
|
Weekly Update 4/24 What has been done? Status Risk Deliverable Date What will be done? Complete |
This was completed last week after we onboarded the first set of open source user! |
Key links
Description
Note
For more information about this deliverable, please refer to the deliverable specification linked above.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: