You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
One of my graphs (the first one, specifically - varying block size) decreases until it reaches the end of the X axis, which looks quite misleading since it looks like it will continue decreasing. I graphed it from 1-32 instead of 1-16, and this new graph shows that it actually stops decreasing on my machine around K=16, which I believe is quite important / relevant.
So I was wondering if it's generally okay to include more detailed graphs instead of the requested ones, providing they show a superset of the requested data & don't obscure the information requested?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
One of my graphs (the first one, specifically - varying block size) decreases until it reaches the end of the X axis, which looks quite misleading since it looks like it will continue decreasing. I graphed it from 1-32 instead of 1-16, and this new graph shows that it actually stops decreasing on my machine around K=16, which I believe is quite important / relevant.
So I was wondering if it's generally okay to include more detailed graphs instead of the requested ones, providing they show a superset of the requested data & don't obscure the information requested?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: