You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Bug fixes:
-Don't multiply frac_sel_pop by matching_sequences (largest population effect? but also more questionable?)
-Normalize response function to compare zero protease to X protease
-Don't correct EC50 values to fix global frac_sel_pop (largest individual effect?)
What sanity checks should we perform?
Manually check a random subset. Look at the counts. See which EC50 method looks better given the counts.
Make sure that it doesn't change past results.
-Brian did this for Gabe's data. It was highly correlated, but there were a fraction of datapoints that changed by a bit.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
-Don't multiply frac_sel_pop by matching_sequences (largest population effect? but also more questionable?)
-Normalize response function to compare zero protease to X protease
-Don't correct EC50 values to fix global frac_sel_pop (largest individual effect?)
What sanity checks should we perform?
Manually check a random subset. Look at the counts. See which EC50 method looks better given the counts.
Make sure that it doesn't change past results.
-Brian did this for Gabe's data. It was highly correlated, but there were a fraction of datapoints that changed by a bit.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: