Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Enhancement: more information about the text models via API #452

Open
ceruleandeep opened this issue Sep 14, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

Enhancement: more information about the text models via API #452

ceruleandeep opened this issue Sep 14, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@ceruleandeep
Copy link

If /v2/status/models?type=text returned more information about the models, clients e.g. SillyTavern could display it to end-users. Maybe other uses such as choosing instruct template or sampler defaults.

We got this request about the Horde model selector in ST: "Is there any way to get more details on Stable Horde models? Even a descriptive summary would help me decide which ones to try for a particular chat." But ST can only display what the Horde API provides.

There are some additional information in db.json but it doesn't seem to be used in AI-Horde (or populated, probably because it's not used).

Perhaps a "metadata" dict could be added to /v2/status/models to give model name, description, URL, style, usage info, or whatever else people think could be helpful. I found the "Popular Models Listing" guide in KoboldAI Discord helpful so providing some of that information to frontends in a structured way would no doubt help more people.

@db0
Copy link
Member

db0 commented Sep 14, 2024

Yes the problem is exactly that the people who maintain the model reference do not provide details about the models.

@db0
Copy link
Member

db0 commented Sep 14, 2024

If you're interested in adding this information I can bring you in contact with the current maintainer to handle it

@ceruleandeep
Copy link
Author

Thank you, that would be good. I did Haidra-Org/AI-Horde-text-model-reference#78 as a proof of concept.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants