[Architecture Request] arm64 docker image

[aozaki-kuro]

For the same reason as outlined in HoloArchivists/fc2-live-dl#45
But adding platforms: linux/amd64, linux/arm64 to the GitHub Actions workflow is insufficient.

I noticed numerous x86_64 targeted build processes within the Dockerfile and failed on local build.

hoshinova/Dockerfile

Line 18 in bb141f7

cargo build --locked --release --target x86_64-unknown-linux-musl; \

hoshinova/Dockerfile

Line 46 in bb141f7

cargo build --locked --release --target x86_64-unknown-linux-musl

hoshinova/Dockerfile

Line 65 in bb141f7

/src/target/x86_64-unknown-linux-musl/release/hoshinova \

🥺

Edit: I forked the repo, replaced all x86_64 with aarch64 and successfully built it in own aarch64 server. But I have no idea how should the whole CI be modified (and seemed to be very slow per build).

[Cellularhacker]

@aozaki-kuro 👍🏼 It's a very good idea. As same as your test, if we need an arm64-based container image, we have to build it it on arm64 machine.

I used to use build them in parallel by OS & Architecture combination by using Github Actions with each combination.

[aozaki-kuro]

As a follow-up, I have forked the repo, replaced the x86_64 with aarch64 and tried to build it on Github Actions.
The build completed successfully on my arm64 server, but it turned out to have some problems with yarn on Actions?

https://github.com/aozaki-kuro/hoshinova/actions/runs/5680895181/job/15395907750#step:6:784
The process probably need some more tweaks 😂