-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 79
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Re-register provider endpoints with admin interface after updates #572
Re-register provider endpoints with admin interface after updates #572
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
To sum up:
-
Check my comments about Thread.sleep() in tests. This is why I'm setting the PR to Request Changes state.
-
Since this implemented feature is not specific to health check services alone, consider testing this with a mock service implementation. You could inject one via StyxServerComponents IIRC. This would avoid having to create mock origins and health checking them just for testing dynamic changes to admin interface providers.
-
Consider tweaking the URL router as per comments.
-
As a team we should consider to write all new code in Kotlin instead of Java. Now we are having a mixture of both. But this is a separate topic.
String providerName = entry.getKey(); | ||
entry.getValue().getStyxService().adminInterfaceHandlers(providerPath(providerName)) | ||
.forEach((relPath, handler) -> | ||
routeBuilder.get(endpointPath(providerName, relPath), new HttpStreamer(MEGABYTE, handler)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We could simplify this code a bit by tweaking the UrlpatternRouter
. So if UrlPatternRouter
took a path prefix constructor argument, in this case /admin/providers
, then all the subsequent calls to routeBuilder.get
could simply pass in the relative path.
I think that would simplify this code a bit and we could possibly get rid of providerPath
and endpointPath
methods.
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ import io.kotlintest.Spec | |||
import io.kotlintest.matchers.string.shouldContain | |||
import io.kotlintest.matchers.string.shouldMatch | |||
import io.kotlintest.specs.FeatureSpec | |||
import java.io.File |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Unused import ^^^.
@@ -64,6 +65,7 @@ class AdminInterfaceSpec : FeatureSpec() { | |||
.shouldMatch("\"[0-9]{1,2}d [0-9]{1,2}h [0-9]{1,2}m\"".toRegex()) | |||
} | |||
} | |||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Unnecessary change.
Thread.sleep(5000) | ||
val response = styxServer.adminRequest("/admin/providers/appA-monitor/status") | ||
response.status() shouldBe OK | ||
response.header(HttpHeaderNames.CONTENT_TYPE).get().toLowerCase() shouldBe HttpHeaderValues.APPLICATION_JSON.toString().toLowerCase() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Use static Imports for HTTP header names.
} | ||
|
||
scenario("The new endpoint returns status information after server restart") { | ||
Thread.sleep(5000) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why the sleep here? Also 5 seconds is quite long. Is this justified?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No, it's not needed at all. It was left over from investigating something earlier in development.
scenario("The new endpoint returns status information without server restart") { | ||
val response = styxServer.adminRequest("/admin/providers/appB-monitor/status") | ||
response.status() shouldBe OK | ||
response.header(HttpHeaderNames.CONTENT_TYPE).get().toLowerCase() shouldBe HttpHeaderValues.APPLICATION_JSON.toString().toLowerCase() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Use static imports.
…5-healthchecker-registration
…tional test that used it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please remove the unnecessary comment blocks. Then proceed to merge.
scenario("Additional endpoints are listed on the Providers admin interface") { | ||
|
||
// styxServer.components().servicesDatabase().insert("mockService", | ||
// ProviderObjectRecord("MockService", setOf(), mockk(), MockService("mockService"))) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Some unnecessary comments here.
|
||
scenario("Endpoints for dynamically removed Styx services are not listed in the Admin interface") { | ||
|
||
// styxServer.components().servicesDatabase().remove("mockService") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
... and here.
See #555