Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support for namespaces for Functions resources #642

Closed
davetropeano opened this issue Jul 9, 2019 · 9 comments
Closed

Support for namespaces for Functions resources #642

davetropeano opened this issue Jul 9, 2019 · 9 comments

Comments

@davetropeano
Copy link
Collaborator

IBM Ckoud Functions recently moved from an org/space model to an IAM controlled namespaces model for all associated objects like actions, triggers, etc.

The associated terraform resources in the provider should support creating namespaces and relating an action to a namespaces etc.

@benoj
Copy link

benoj commented Jul 16, 2019

+1

1 similar comment
@khayama-zz
Copy link

+1

@powellquiring
Copy link

IAM is required for IBM's secure to the core strategy. The GUI is suggesting it:
image

@khayama-zz
Copy link

+1

@davetropeano
Copy link
Collaborator Author

This is related to #837 and both have not been addressed. It is unclear how https://github.com/IBM-Cloud/terraform-provider-ibm/blob/master/examples/ibm-function-cloudant-trigger would work as well given all this.

@cncook001
Copy link

+1

1 similar comment
@pheuberger
Copy link

+1

@benoj
Copy link

benoj commented Jun 25, 2020

Just for FYI on people recently +1'ing this. I ended up migrating to AWS because of this issue (and the other pains I had as we were testing out the IBM platform) I suggest you do the same if possible

@khayama-zz
Copy link

khayama-zz commented Aug 24, 2020

#837 (comment)

https://github.com/IBM-Cloud/terraform-provider-ibm/releases/tag/v1.9.0
This release support creating the cloud functions for both CF and IAM namespace

@hkantare hkantare closed this as completed Dec 7, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

7 participants