Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Feb 28, 2020. It is now read-only.

fix(package): update generator-ibm-service-enablement to version 0.6.5 #423

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 15, 2018

Conversation

greenkeeper[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@greenkeeper greenkeeper bot commented Jan 10, 2018

Version 0.6.5 of generator-ibm-service-enablement was just published.

Dependency generator-ibm-service-enablement
Current Version 0.6.4
Type dependency

The version 0.6.5 is not covered by your current version range.

If you don’t accept this pull request, your project will work just like it did before. However, you might be missing out on a bunch of new features, fixes and/or performance improvements from the dependency update.

It might be worth looking into these changes and trying to get this project onto the latest version of generator-ibm-service-enablement.

If you have a solid test suite and good coverage, a passing build is a strong indicator that you can take advantage of these changes directly by merging the proposed change into your project. If the build fails or you don’t have such unconditional trust in your tests, this branch is a great starting point for you to work on the update.


Commits

The new version differs by 4 commits.

  • 429c7bb Merge pull request #177 from ibm-developer/updateTo0.6.5
  • 74832dc chore(release): 0.6.5
  • a882a34 Merge pull request #176 from ibm-developer/python-services-fix
  • faf651b fix: Python generates empty mappings file when no services are added

See the full diff

FAQ and help

There is a collection of frequently asked questions. If those don’t help, you can always ask the humans behind Greenkeeper.


Your Greenkeeper bot 🌴

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Jan 11, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #423 into develop will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop     #423   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    90.82%   90.82%           
========================================
  Files            9        9           
  Lines         1329     1329           
========================================
  Hits          1207     1207           
  Misses         122      122

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 9cb8438...23b3d32. Read the comment docs.

@tunniclm tunniclm changed the title Update generator-ibm-service-enablement to the latest version 🚀 fix(package): update generator-ibm-service-enablement to version 0.6.5 Jan 11, 2018
@greenkeeper
Copy link
Contributor Author

greenkeeper bot commented Jan 11, 2018

Version 0.6.6 just got published.

Update to this version instead 🚀

Commits

The new version differs by 4 commits.

  • 09c527c Merge pull request #181 from ibm-developer/updateTo0.6.6
  • 4164e5c chore(release): 0.6.6
  • 5bb9e5a Merge pull request #180 from ibm-developer/Aerex-patch-1
  • 5a02ed7 fix(docs): remove development branch from contribution section

See the full diff

@tunniclm tunniclm merged commit 6769e0b into develop Jan 15, 2018
@tunniclm tunniclm deleted the greenkeeper/generator-ibm-service-enablement-0.6.5 branch January 15, 2018 13:19
tunniclm added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 26, 2018
Release 4.4.0

### Bug Fixes

* **package:** update generator-ibm-cloud-enablement to version 0.6.13 ([#416](#416)) ([13a14f5](13a14f5))
* **package:** update generator-ibm-service-enablement to version 0.6.5 ([#423](#423)) ([6769e0b](6769e0b))
* make RouteTests more lenient on index content ([#427](#427)) ([1ae501e](1ae501e))
* **unsupported services:** added tests to check for unwanted behavior when given unsupported service payloads from custom bluemix string ([#431](#431)) ([b3e1870](b3e1870))
* use correct redis default port ([#433](#433)) ([623f206](623f206))


### Features

* model support for swagger ([#422](#422)) ([9cb8438](9cb8438))
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants