-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 33
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Enhancement Request: add IBM Power Linux Platform (ppc64le) support #249
Comments
About #3 above, even after getting the shellcheck binary built and copied to the expected location, I'm facing issue with the sonatypecommunity/nancy:latest image which is not multi-arch. Error log:
Should I try and resolve this dependency? Or can we live without lint target on ppc64le? Please advise. |
@JohnStarich could you please provide guidance on the above points? |
@JohnStarich @pdettori is there anyone that can take a look at this issue. It looks like some underlying components need to be created as multi-arch? Should Amit look into that or is someone from an appropriate squad looking into that? thanks! |
@amitsadaphule Is the requirement only multi-arch images? I don't think we need to run the entire pipeline as ppc to get that result. We don't have the resources to implement this, but I'd be happy to discuss and review PRs. I've messaged you on internal Slack, so we can continue our discussions there. |
Hi,
I've been able to build and validate the operator on ppc64le. I've also published the build-script here. I'm trying to get the changes for adding ppc64le support merged. Since ppc64le is also a supported architecture in travis, I'm also aiming towards adding the ppc64le build to the travis job.
However, there are a few things where I am a bit confused and need some guidance:
config/default/manager_auth_proxy_patch.yaml
is not multi-arch. So, I need to usecarlosedp/kube-rbac-proxy:v0.5.0
for ppc64le. But I can't find a clean way to accommodate this requirement to use different image based on current ARCH.secure
parameters?shellcheck
, which is needed forlint
target, does not have ppc64le support yet. But I've been able to build it on ppc64le. I'm thinking of adding a script to build shellcheck inhack
directory and reference that here for ppc64le by adding an ARCH check. Does that sound good? Is there a better way to do this?carlosedp/kube-rbac-proxy:v0.5.0
instead ofgcr.io/kubebuilder/kube-rbac-proxy:v0.5.0
) can be included there. Please advise.Thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: