Heatmap Top K

[PaulJonasJost]

also Related: Single gene Visualization test (=SGV)

If we choose the top K by log fold change this might still be feasible but for significance, we should probably require the sig ana to have run the comparison?
In SGV we use t-test and should perhaps notify people that this pvalue is different to the pvalue from e.g. deseq

[LeaSeep]

• fine for me to notify user to first run SigAna however we state that the modules work independent from each other & can be done in arbitrary order which would be then slightly violated. Still , would agree to require user to first run stat. analysis if one wants to have top k based on pvalue. To then not only have LFC as choice for Top k we could also have top varying (based on sd) as option
  -SGV - agree should notify

[PaulJonasJost]

Future trumpets on

If we have outsourced the sigana functions and other functions enough, we can also trigger a significance analysis from the heatmap server that does this, saves it in res_tmp$Sig_Ana and then uses it 🙈

Yes could have some additional choices here. Based on SD sounds good. Will for now only add a warning if the comparison has not been done yet.