Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

February 2025 Release- Pricetaker tasks #1576

Closed
5 tasks done
adam-a-a opened this issue Feb 20, 2025 · 0 comments
Closed
5 tasks done

February 2025 Release- Pricetaker tasks #1576

adam-a-a opened this issue Feb 20, 2025 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
Priority:Normal Normal Priority Issue or PR

Comments

@adam-a-a
Copy link
Contributor

adam-a-a commented Feb 20, 2025

February 2025 Release:
**Finish PR #1358 **
The PriceTaker class must still be merged into the main codebase. This class and associated workflow can be useful for projects related to DISPATCHES-type work. For example, modeling flexible desalination in WaterTAP is of interest, and we could make use of the Pricetaker class.

Here is a to-do list based on @andrewlee94 's suggested changes and @radhakrishnatg 's suggestions for enhancement.

  • Add technical reference for Pricetaker class @MarcusHolly Price taker model for DISPATCHES, Rehashed #1358

  • Add test file for design_and_operation_model.py @radhakrishnatg

  • Strengthen unit tests across the board (e.g., test add_startup_shutdown and other methods); consider simpler dummy cases for unit testing all the methods in isolation @adam-a-a

  • Enable addition of startup, shutdown, ramping, etc. constraints when representative days (as opposed to full-year price signal) are used

  • Enable addition of cash flow/cost expressions when representative days are used

@ksbeattie ksbeattie added the Priority:Normal Normal Priority Issue or PR label Feb 20, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Priority:Normal Normal Priority Issue or PR
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants