You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thanks for the publishing such a large scale dataset!
I'm interesting in the automatic motion annotation details, and have some questions about the local pose optimization procedure. Equation 3 in the paper is as follow:
I have 2 questions here:
PhysCap framely solves torques and accelerations, then use finite difference and PD controller to manipulate an proxy robot to imitate the input (noisy) motion sequence. I can't see there is any "physical loss" that can be directly integrated in the pose optimization procedure. I wonder how you construct this physical loss term?
Could you kindly provide the weighting factors?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks for the publishing such a large scale dataset!
I'm interesting in the automatic motion annotation details, and have some questions about the local pose optimization procedure. Equation 3 in the paper is as follow:
I have 2 questions here:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: