You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Overview of the Feature Request
As mentioned in this discussion (https://groups.google.com/g/dataverse-community/c/Bj_dbHTeu2o/m/fFyyWfAsBAAJ), it would be interesting if Dataverse could support BCE (Before Common Era) dates. This functionality would greatly benefit datasets related to fields such as ancient history or archaeology.
What kind of user is the feature intended for?
API User, Curator, Depositor
What inspired the request?
We have several research centers that work with archaeological data.
What existing behavior do you want changed?
Allowing negative dates to be added, particularly in the 'time period covered' field, would be very useful.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
However, search capabilities for date fields in Dataverse are currently limited, because they are treated as text strings rather than dates.
Since the Solr search index underlying Dataverse supports BC dates (using the ISO 8601 format: 1 BC = +0000, 2 BC = -0001, and so on), I think we could add better search capabilities for BC dates relatively easily after #10887 is merged.
Overview of the Feature Request
As mentioned in this discussion (https://groups.google.com/g/dataverse-community/c/Bj_dbHTeu2o/m/fFyyWfAsBAAJ), it would be interesting if Dataverse could support BCE (Before Common Era) dates. This functionality would greatly benefit datasets related to fields such as ancient history or archaeology.
What kind of user is the feature intended for?
API User, Curator, Depositor
What inspired the request?
We have several research centers that work with archaeological data.
What existing behavior do you want changed?
Allowing negative dates to be added, particularly in the 'time period covered' field, would be very useful.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: