Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Clean up user code (review specific methods for shib and built in user on AuthenticatedUser) #1456

Closed
scolapasta opened this issue Feb 17, 2015 · 4 comments
Closed

Clean up user code (review specific methods for shib and built in user on AuthenticatedUser) #1456

scolapasta opened this issue Feb 17, 2015 · 4 comments
Assignees
@scolapasta
Labels
Component: Code Infrastructure formerly "Feature: Code Infrastructure"

Comments

@scolapasta
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@scolapasta scolapasta added the Component: Code Infrastructure formerly "Feature: Code Infrastructure" label Feb 17, 2015
@scolapasta scolapasta self-assigned this Feb 17, 2015
@scolapasta scolapasta added this to the 4.0.1 milestone Feb 17, 2015
@scolapasta scolapasta changed the title Clean up user code (review specific methods for shib and built in user on AuthenticatedUser Clean up user code (review specific methods for shib and built in user on AuthenticatedUser) Feb 17, 2015
@scolapasta scolapasta modified the milestones: In Review - Short Term, 4.0.1 Apr 18, 2015
@pdurbin
Copy link
Member

pdurbin commented Jan 8, 2016

@scolapasta what is this issue about?

@scolapasta scolapasta removed their assignment Jan 27, 2016
@scolapasta scolapasta removed this from the Not Assigned to a Release milestone Jan 28, 2016
@pdurbin pdurbin mentioned this issue Feb 12, 2016
Closed
20 tasks
@scolapasta scolapasta self-assigned this Mar 3, 2016
@pdurbin
Copy link
Member

pdurbin commented Apr 20, 2016

"methods that were specific to shibboleth that ideally would exist in a general way or not at all"

@mheppler mheppler mentioned this issue Dec 21, 2016
Closed
@pdurbin
Copy link
Member

pdurbin commented Dec 21, 2016

As @mheppler suggested at #3486 (comment) I think we should close this issue in favor of #3486.

@mheppler
Copy link
Contributor

Duplicate of Improve consistency of various remote auth options (Shibboleth vs. OAuth) #3486

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@scolapasta scolapasta

Labels
Component: Code Infrastructure formerly "Feature: Code Infrastructure"
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@pdurbin @mheppler @scolapasta