-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
C4KC-KiTS: Refinement of the submitted DICOM SEGs #2
Comments
I emailed Nick Heller asking to clarify about saggital segmentations. |
Sent another reminder on Jan 15, no response. |
Finally had a conversation with Nick Heller. The sagittal orientation of segmentations is an accident, and he agrees it makes a lot of sense to store those in axial orientation consistent with the imaging data orientation. The non-DICOM segmentations are in this repository: https://github.com/neheller/kits19/tree/master/data. However, due to some problem on TCIA, the images corresponding to this dataset are currently not available and appear as restricted access. Waiting to have that issue resolved. |
@afshinmessiah what needs to be done:
Let me know if this makes sense! Thank you for your help with this. |
Given further clarification from the data submitter, we should use the DICOM SEG content instead of the nifti files in the github repo. Let's adjust the process as follows:
You can get the CT series that corresponds to the SEG from Once you have the process worked out for a single case, please let me know so we can review together before proceeding with the conversion for the whole collection. |
Hear is the code&result for case 2 of the data: |
You're right. At first, I wrote the code to use this segmentation set. Since they lack the origin I couldn't use the dicom image as ref image directly. I had to take care of output image properties myself. For the dicom segmentation though, the image properties were correct and I could use dicom image as ref image for them. |
Yes, looks good now - thanks! Can you make a folder named Let's wait to hear back about the issue above before proceeding with the conversion for the whole dataset. |
@afshinmessiah I confirmed the segmentation you generated loads correctly in OHIF Viewer (you can use the link in the issue above and try yourself - it does not always work, but that is due to issues in OHIF Viewer, not the data). Please go ahead with the conversion of the complete dataset! |
Here you can find all cases. |
Thank you @afshinmessiah! Next time, would be great if you could upload the resulting dataset into the cloud bucket instead of Dropbox (for this one, I am already uploading). There is an issue-specific folder here where I organize data: https://console.cloud.google.com/storage/browser/tcia-idc-datareviewcoordination/?forceOnBucketsSortingFiltering=false&project=idc-tcia |
Sorry! @fedorov. Sure I will. I checked the link on my gmail account, says : |
@wlongabaugh can you please add @afshinmessiah to the |
Now that @afshinmessiah has access, please use gsutil to upload the original TCIA C4KC-KiTS collection into this folder: https://console.cloud.google.com/storage/browser/tcia-idc-datareviewcoordination/issue-2/C4KC-KiTS_images/?forceOnBucketsSortingFiltering=false&project=idc-tcia. |
Done. |
spot checks completed in OHIF viewer, dataset shared with TCIA via https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1XiQEnGNxCCUkGK_pwjIVwJsZ-QNS7MPB?usp=sharing |
Dataset: https://dx.doi.org/10.7937/TCIA.2019.IX49E8NX
Description: This collection contains subjects from the training set of the 2019 Kidney and Kidney Tumor Segmentation Challenge (KiTS19). The challenge aimed to accelerate progress in automatic 3D semantic segmentation by releasing a dataset of CT scans for 210 patients with manual semantic segmentations of the kidneys and tumors in the corticomedullary phase.
The imaging was collected during routine care of patients who were treated by either partial or radical nephrectomy at the University of Minnesota Medical Center. Many of the CT scans were acquired at referring institutions and are therefore heterogeneous in terms of scanner manufacturers and acquisition protocols. Semantic segmentations were performed by students under the supervision of an experienced urologic cancer surgeon.
Segmentations were created using dcmqi.
The issue is that segmentations are stored as sagittal series, while CT images are axial. This is one of the reasons there are difficulties loading this dataset into OHIF Viewer (see OHIF/Viewers#1345), and potentially this can cause problems for other tools and users.
Since it will be a completely lossless operation to store those segmentations as axial, should not be very difficult, and should not affect users of the collections (the dataset has just been released), it may be worthwhile to fix this now.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: