Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Content Change Request #247

Open
paulakeen opened this issue Feb 23, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

Content Change Request #247

paulakeen opened this issue Feb 23, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@paulakeen
Copy link

Which part of the repository is your change request related to?
https://docs.internationaldataspaces.org/ids-ram-4/context-of-the-international-data-spaces/2_1_data-driven-business_ecosystems/2_2_data_sovereignty_as_a_key_capability

Please describe which content you would expect here and tell us how to solve this request
in the "Business Area" of Public Sector, and more specifically in the Business Case of Public Administrations, the current definition of Data Sovereignty is misleading (to say the least). The current definition reads:

"Data Sovereignty is the ability of a natural or legal person to exclusively and sovereignly decide concerning the usage of data as an economic asset."

Can you already provide any alternative (or updated) content that can/should replace the existing content?

I propose removing the determinant "economic" from the definition. However, a definition (or understanding) of asset should also be referred to or provided. In previous works I used this one: "Something or someone that provides worth when endowed with a purpose". Since this definition is arguable, I propose that we work on this definition together, by breaking down what the asset can be from a domain-agnostic perspective and illustrated with domain-specific examples.

Additional notes
The rationale to challenge the current definition is that, in Public Sector, the worth or benefit emerging from the purpose and use of the asset is not always economic, but social, cultural, political, personal, ecological, etc.

The concept of asset has never been well and sufficiently defined, IMO. One proof of this (my) statement is the (poor, tautologic and ambiguous) definition of what an Asset is in the ADMS vocabulary (https://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-adms/#asset).

@anilturkmayali anilturkmayali transferred this issue from International-Data-Spaces-Association/idsa Apr 5, 2023
@anilturkmayali
Copy link
Member

As the issue is relevant for IDS RAM, it's transferred.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants